Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

08:27
Quantification of Oculomotor Responses and Accommodation Through Instrumentation and Analysis Toolboxes
Published on: March 3, 2023
Conventional Versus Virtual Reality-Based Hess-Lancaster Assessment: Agreement and Repeatability in Ocular Motility
Francisco Javier Povedano-Montero1,2, Álvaro Perales-Serrano1, Daniela León Lobo1
1Optometry and Vision Department, Faculty of Optics and Optometry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28037 Madrid, Spain.
Journal of Eye Movement Research
|June 25, 2026
Summary
A new virtual reality (VR) Hess-Lancaster test shows moderate agreement with the conventional method for assessing ocular misalignment. This VR approach offers a standardized framework for ocular motility assessment, with potential for improved clinical application.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Vision Science
- Medical Technology
Background:
- The conventional Hess-Lancaster test is a standard for assessing ocular misalignment but relies on subjective input and manual data collection.
- Virtual reality (VR) offers a potential for a more objective and standardized approach to ocular motility assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the agreement and repeatability of ocular deviation measurements between a conventional Hess-Lancaster test and a novel VR-based implementation.
- To evaluate the Dicopt Pro VR system for ocular motility diagnostics.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional observational study involving 52 adults with ocular motility disorders.
- Participants completed both conventional and VR-based Hess-Lancaster assessments at predefined gaze positions.
- Statistical analyses included Bland-Altman analysis, concordance correlation coefficients, and intraclass correlation coefficients for agreement and repeatability.
Main Results:
- The VR Hess-Lancaster test demonstrated moderate agreement (concordance correlation coefficient of 0.57) with the conventional test.
- Mean bias was minimal (1.22 PD right eye, 0.10 PD left eye).
- Repeatability estimates were moderate to good (ICC 0.62–0.83), though based on a subset of participants.
Conclusions:
- The VR-based Hess-Lancaster assessment is a viable alternative, showing good agreement and repeatability compared to the conventional method.
- Findings suggest VR can provide a standardized framework for ocular motility assessment.
- Both methods require interpretation within the broader clinical context.
Keywords:
Bland–Altman analysisDicopt ProHess–Lancaster testocular motilityrepeatabilitystrabismusvirtual reality
