Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
SIENA Score and CVP/PCWP Predict Mid-Term Prognosis After LVAD Implantation: A Single-Center Study.
Giulia Elena Mandoli1, Maria Barilli1, Maria Concetta Pastore1
1Department of Medical Biotechnologies, Division of Cardiology, University of Siena, Policlinico "Le Scotte", 53100 Siena, Italy.
Selecting patients without right ventricular dysfunction using the SIENA protocol significantly lowers the risk of post-LVAD right ventricular failure. A central venous pressure/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio over 0.63 may predict adverse outcomes in LVAD patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a key therapy for end-stage heart failure.
- Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a significant complication impacting LVAD patient outcomes.
- Predictive markers for RVF and adverse events post-LVAD are crucial for improving patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters for predicting RVF and adverse outcomes after LVAD implantation.
- To assess the efficacy of the SIENA protocol in identifying patients at low risk for RVF.
- To identify novel prognostic markers for mortality and hospitalization in LVAD recipients.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 29 end-stage heart failure patients undergoing LVAD implantation was screened using the SIENA protocol and standard indications.
- Patients underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) and were followed for 1 year to monitor for RVF, mortality, and hospitalization.
- Various clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and RHC parameters were analyzed for their association with adverse outcomes.
Main Results:
- None of the patients (SIENA score 0-1) developed RVF (primary endpoint).
- A central venous pressure/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (CVP/PCWP) ratio greater than 0.63 was significantly associated with adverse outcomes (mortality and rehospitalization) (ß = 2.99, p = 0.026).
- No other tested indices showed significant association with adverse outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Pre-implantation screening for RV dysfunction using the SIENA protocol effectively reduces the incidence of post-LVAD RVF.
- The CVP/PCWP ratio serves as a potential prognostic indicator for adverse events in patients with LVADs.
- Careful patient selection is paramount to minimize RVF risk following LVAD implantation.
More Related Videos
07:39Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
05:18Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) in Juvenile Landrace Swine: A LVAD Implantation Model of Pediatric Heart Failure
Published on: January 16, 2026