Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Continuous Suture Technique in Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Early and Mid-Term Outcomes in a Real-World Cohort
Eray Aksoy1, Zumrut Tuba Demirozu2, Sami Gurkahraman1
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Vehbi Koc Foundation American Hospital, 34365 Istanbul, Türkiye.
None:
The continuous suture technique is not routinely used in surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), and data regarding its clinical outcomes remain limited. This retrospective observational study evaluated early and mid-term outcomes after continuous suture SAVR in a real-world cohort. Eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent SAVR using a continuous suture technique between November 2015 and July 2024 were included. Both isolated and concomitant procedures were analyzed. The operative technique consisted of three 2-0 polypropylene sutures, one placed along each aortic cusp. Clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, and survival were assessed. The mean age was 62.22 ± 15.22 years, and 71.6% of patients were male. Bioprosthetic valves were implanted in 61.4% of cases, and the mean prosthesis size was 25.02 ± 0.93 mm. Concomitant procedures were performed in 86.4% of patients. There were no in-hospital deaths. New-onset atrial fibrillation occurred in 26.1% of patients, and permanent pacemaker implantation was required in 3.4%. The median cross-clamp time was 41.50 min. During a mean follow-up of 18.38 months, one- and three-year overall survival was 92.9%. No prosthetic valve dysfunction related to thrombus, pannus formation, or clinically significant paravalvular leak was observed. Continuous suture SAVR appears feasible and safe, with acceptable early and mid-term outcomes, although the retrospective, non-comparative design requires cautious interpretation.

