Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

09:58
Recording Brain Activity with Ear-Electroencephalography
Published on: March 31, 2023
Preprocessing on the Go: Practices in Gait-Related Mobile EEG.
Vaishali Vinod1, Lara Johanna Papin2, Robbin Romijnders1
1Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel and Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Psychophysiology
|June 25, 2026
Summary
Mobile electroencephalography (EEG) studies on gait show varied data processing methods. This review maps these diverse preprocessing pipelines, highlighting inconsistencies in artifact rejection and reporting, which hinders cross-study comparisons.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Gait Analysis
Background:
- Mobile electroencephalography (EEG) is increasingly used to study brain activity during human locomotion.
- The refinement of preprocessing pipelines for mobile EEG data is crucial for accurate analysis of gait dynamics.
- Existing preprocessing methods exhibit significant diversity, complicating the comparison of findings across different research studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and map the preprocessing pipelines employed in studies combining mobile EEG and gait measurements.
- To identify and visualize the heterogeneity in preprocessing steps, their order, combinations, and reporting detail.
- To highlight variations in artifact rejection methods and their impact on data comparability.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a comprehensive literature review of studies integrating mobile EEG with gait analysis.
- Identified and categorized preprocessing pipeline components, from raw data to derived outcomes like PSD, ERSP, ERD/ERS, and CMC.
- Visualized the diversity of pipelines and analyzed variations, particularly in artifact rejection techniques and reporting standards.
Main Results:
- Substantial heterogeneity was observed in preprocessing pipeline steps, their sequence, and combinations across studies.
- Significant variability exists in the tools and reporting practices for artifact rejection.
- The diverse approaches challenge the comparability of results derived from different mobile EEG and gait studies.
Conclusions:
- The current landscape of mobile EEG preprocessing for gait analysis is characterized by considerable heterogeneity.
- Inconsistent artifact rejection and reporting practices impede cross-study comparisons and the establishment of field-wide standards.
- There is a critical need for transparent reporting standards and the development of shared methodologies within the mobile EEG research community.
