Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies
  1. Home
  2. Artificial Intelligence Approaches For Osteoporotic Fracture Risk Prediction Using Administrative Health Data: A Systematic Review.
  1. Home
  2. Artificial Intelligence Approaches For Osteoporotic Fracture Risk Prediction Using Administrative Health Data: A Systematic Review.

Related Concept Videos

Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling01:31

Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling

Osteoclasts are cells responsible for bone resorption and remodeling. They originate from hematopoietic progenitor cells present in the bone marrow. Numerous progenitor cells fuse to form multinucleated cells, each with 10-20 nuclei. A single osteoclast has a diameter of 150 to 200 µM. These cells have ruffled borders that break down the underlying bone tissue and release minerals such as calcium into the blood in bone resorption. Osteoclasts cling to bones with their ruffled edges during bone...
Bone Disorders01:29

Bone Disorders

Aging and its effect on bone remodeling is the most common cause of bone disorders. In young and healthy people, bone deposition and resorption happen at an equal rate to maintain optimal bone health.
Bone deposition is also affected by the levels of sex hormones like estrogen and testosterone that promote osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis. When the level of these hormones decreases due to aging, it causes a reduction in bone deposition. As a result, bone resorption by osteoclasts...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The relationship between clinical characteristics, sociodemographic factors and sedentary behavior in adults with chronic conditions: a cross-sectional study from the Lolland-Falster Health Study.

European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity·2026
Same author

Accelerometer-measured sleep habits in Danish children and adolescents aged 3 to 17 years: a pooled analysis with 9000 participants from six cross-sectional population-based studies.

Sleep·2026
Same author

Empagliflozin and functional aerobic capacity in individuals with increased risk of heart failure: The Empire Prevent Cardiac trial.

American heart journal·2026
Same author

Adding High-Intensity Interval Training to a Multidisciplinary Lifestyle Intervention for Childhood Obesity: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial to Examine the Effects on Physical Activity Behavior.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2025
Same author

Increased prospective cardiovascular disease risk in 127 517 Nordic women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a national cohort study.

European journal of endocrinology·2025
Same author

Cross-sectional and prospective associations of screen media use with non-sedentary time and body positions in young children.

Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie·2025
Same journal

The Important Role of Polycystin in the Skeletal System.

Calcified tissue international·2026
Same journal

Effects of High-Impact Exercise on Bone Marker Concentrations During Controlled Low Energy Availability in Recreational Female Runners.

Calcified tissue international·2026
Same journal

BMAL1 Proteostasis, Circadian Dysfunction, and Ferroptotic Vulnerability in Osteoporosis: Current Evidence and Experimental Priorities.

Calcified tissue international·2026
Same journal

Parathyroid Hormone Related Peptide (PTHrP) Revisited: A Comparison of Levels in Malignant and Non-malignant Conditions.

Calcified tissue international·2026
Same journal

Functional model for amelogenesis: polarization and pH sensitivity of calcium uptake in ameloblast-derived HAT-7 cells.

Calcified tissue international·2026
Same journal

Editorial "Enamel" Issue.

Calcified tissue international·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Osteoporotic Fracture Risk Prediction Using Administrative Health Data: A

Benjamin Bakke Hansen1, Kasper Westphal Leth2, Nana Roust Hansen2

  • 1Research Unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000, Odense, Denmark. Benjamin.Bakke.Hansen@rsyd.dk.

Calcified Tissue International
|June 25, 2026

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning models using administrative data show promise for predicting osteoporotic fractures. However, limited external validation and clinical utility evaluation hinder widespread implementation of these fracture risk prediction tools.

Keywords:
Administrative dataArtificial intelligenceFracture risk predictionMachine learningRegister dataSystematic review

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Osteoporotic fractures pose a significant public health burden.
  • Accurate fracture risk prediction is crucial for timely intervention.
  • Administrative data offers a scalable resource for risk modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review machine learning (ML) models for osteoporotic fracture risk prediction using only administrative data.
  • To evaluate model development, performance, risk of bias, and applicability concerns.
  • To identify gaps for future research and clinical implementation.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, IEEE, and Web of Science (PRISMA guidelines).
  • Inclusion of studies developing/validating ML models for adult osteoporotic fracture risk using administrative data.
  • Risk of bias and applicability assessment using the PROBAST tool.

Main Results:

  • Seven studies were included, utilizing various ML models (Random Forests, XGBoost, etc.).
  • Moderate-to-good discriminative performance observed (AUC 0.818-0.905).
  • Applicability concerns noted due to specific subpopulations/database features; limited external validation (2 studies) and no clinical utility evaluation.

Conclusions:

  • ML models with administrative data show potential for automated, scalable fracture risk prediction.
  • Clinical implementation requires enhanced external validation and formal utility assessment.
  • Future research should focus on model recalibration and robustness over novel model development.