Does Hormonal Phase Affect Acute High-Intensity Interval Training Exercise? An Evaluation of Performance and Fatigue
Sam R Moore1,2, Kelly E Joniak1, Alex N Ladan1
1Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract:
Moore, SR, Joniak, KE, Ladan, AN, Britton, ME, Cantu, EI, Hirsch, KR, Hackney, AC, and Smith-Ryan, AE. Does hormonal phase affect acute high-intensity interval training exercise? An evaluation of performance and fatigue. J Strength Cond Res 40(9): e901-e908, 2026-Fatigue is a critical factor in high-intensity interval training (HIIT) performance, which may vary across female hormonal phases and with changes in work-rest ratio. This study evaluated exercise performance (average power [AP], peak power [PP]) and fatigue (power drop [PD; peak power-minimum power/time]) between 2 work-matched HIIT protocols during the low- (LHP) and high-hormone phases (HHP). In total, 35 women (age: 24.3 ± 6.1 years) completed 4 HIIT trials in randomized orders of hormonal phase and HIIT protocol: HIIT 1:1 : 10 rounds of 1 minute on/1 minute off; HIIT 2:1 : 20 rounds of 20 s on/10 s off. High-intensity interval training 2:1 resulted in significantly higher AP (HIIT 1:1 -HIIT 2:1 Δ-36.6 ± 2.3 W; p < 0.001) and PP (Δ-34.1 ± 4.0 W; p < 0.001) than HIIT 1:1 , with no significant difference between phase differences. When analyzed by protocol, HIIT 2:1 demonstrated greater PD in the LHP than in the HHP (Δ11.4 ± 4.7 W; p = 0.020), with no significant difference between phases for HIIT 1:1 . When collapsed across protocols, PD was significantly greater in the LHP than in the HHP (LHP-HHP Δ11.2 ± 4.9 W·s -1 ; p = 0.031). High-intensity interval training power performance (AP, PP) was influenced by the work-rest ratio, but not hormonal phase, with significantly higher power output in HIIT 2:1 . Greater PD during the LHP suggests physical fatigue may vary across hormonal phases, but the lack of HIIT 1:1 PD differences between phases may indicate augmented recovery with the equal work-rest ratio, particularly during the LHP. Although power performance was minimally different between phases, altering work-rest ratio may be a consideration for maintaining power outcomes and managing fatigue across female hormonal cycles, particularly in the LHP.
More Related Videos
06:28A Chronic High-Intensity Interval Training and Diet-Induced Obesity Model to Maximize Exercise Effort and Induce Physiologic Changes in Rats
Published on: April 28, 2023
04:28Evaluation of Blood Lactate and Plasma Insulin During High-intensity Exercise by Antecubital Vein Catheterization
Published on: May 18, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Exercise and Cardiovascular Response
Light to moderate physical activity initiates a series of interconnected responses in the body. The heart rate modestly increases in anticipation of the workout, followed by widespread vasodilation as oxygen consumption by skeletal muscles increases. This results in decreased peripheral resistance, increased capillary blood flow, and accelerated...
Muscle Recovery and Fatigue
Factors Influencing Heart Rate
Let us explore the significant factors affecting heart rate, including age, body temperature, posture, acute pain, chemical influences,...
Exercise and Muscle Performance
Endurance exercises
Endurance exercises involve running, swimming, or cycling, which require repetitive movements with low force output. When a person engages in endurance exercise, a few noticeable changes occur in their skeletal muscles. For instance, the number of capillaries...
Exercise Stress Test
Exercise stress testing, commonly known as a treadmill test, is a noninvasive procedure used to evaluate cardiovascular function and diagnose heart conditions.
Definition
An exercise stress test measures the heart's response to exertion using a treadmill or stationary bicycle. Chest electrodes record the heart's electrical activity through an ECG, and blood pressure is monitored regularly.
Purposes
