Hydrogel-Coated Clips Are Associated with a Higher Risk of Dislocation After Ultrasound-Guided Breast Biopsy

Background: Breast clip marker movement after ultrasound-guided biopsy can negatively affect lesion re-localisation rates and surgical outcomes, underscoring the need for improved understanding of the factors influencing clip displacement. Thus, this study aimed to compare four different breast clip markers and identify risk factors for clip migration and dislocation after ultrasound-guided placement. Methods: This retrospective study included 350 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided biopsy of a newly diagnosed breast lesion with placement of one of four types of breast clips (UltraClip Dual Trigger Biodur 108 Coil Marker [UC], TUMARK Professional [TP], TUMARK Vision [TV] and HydroMARK Breast Biopsy Site Marker [HM]). Clip migration and dislocation were assessed immediately after placement and during follow-up imaging for at least 3 months. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of clip dislocation including lesional, perilesional and procedural parameters. Results: Clip migration rates were 26.0%, 18.0%, 10.0% and 25.0% and clip dislocation rates were 14.0%, 20.0%, 9.0% and 38.0% for UC, TP, TV and HM, respectively. Features significantly associated with clip dislocation included predominantly fatty surrounding tissue (p = 0.046) with low perilesional shear wave velocities (p = 0.054), smooth lesion contours (p = 0.041), soft lesion strain elastography (p =0.001), low clip-to-lesion-surface distance (p = 0.002) and the use of an HM breast clip (p = 0.032). Conclusions: The type of breast clip-marker, as well as perilesional and lesional characteristics, influence the likelihood of clip dislocation. Notably, the hydrogel-coated clip (HM) exhibited the highest rate of dislocation.