Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

12:18
A Murine Model of a Burn Wound Reconstructed with an Allogeneic Skin Graft
Published on: August 8, 2020
Experimental Burn Induction in Laboratory Animals: A Scoping Review of Methods, Reproducibility, Operator-Dependent
Antonios Kyriakopoulos1, Michalis Katsimpoulas2, Vasilios Kyriakopoulos3
1Plastic Surgery Department, Evaggelismos General Hospital of Athens, 10676 Athens, Greece.
Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
|June 26, 2026
Summary
Method heterogeneity in burn induction models hinders research reproducibility. Standardizing burn induction techniques and reporting variability is crucial for improving the validity and translation of findings in burn research and soft-tissue repair.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Translational Research
- Experimental Surgery
Background:
- Experimental animal models are vital for burn research and soft-tissue reconstruction.
- Methodological inconsistencies in these models compromise reproducibility and translation of results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review burn induction methods in animal models.
- To assess reproducibility, depth modulation, wound area stability, validation, and operator variability.
Main Methods:
- A PRISMA-ScR systematic review was performed using multiple databases.
- In vivo animal studies were screened and data charted by independent reviewers.
- Evidence was mapped by burn modality, exposure control, validation, and operator-dependent factors.
Main Results:
- Significant variation exists in species, burn modalities (contact, scald, steam, radiant/infrared), and device designs.
- Wound area exhibited higher reproducibility than depth, which was influenced by numerous factors.
- Operator-sensitive variability was identified in force, alignment, and exposure geometry.
Conclusions:
- Burn induction is a measurement system challenge requiring standardization.
- Constraining operator-sensitive variables and standardizing validation timing can enhance study validity.
- Quantitative reporting of variability is essential for improving comparability and translation in burn research.

