Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026
A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
Trunk Impact Conditions in Mountain Biking: Biomechanical Insights for Back Protector Evaluation
Sophie Bonte1,2, Arsène Thouzé2, Wei Wei1
1Laboratoire de Biomécanique Appliquée, Aix-Marseille Université, Université Gustave Eiffel, 13015 Marseille, France.
Background:
Mountain biking is increasingly popular but carries a large risk of severe trunk and spinal injuries. However, realistic crash scenarios for back protector design remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to define trunk impact conditions during mountain biking crashes.
Methods:
A multi-body model for mountain bike accident reconstruction was developed, and its kinematics were validated against real-world crash video footage. The model was then used to assess the influence of initial conditions (speed, slope, crash cause, etc.) on trunk impact kinematics (velocities, forces, pseudo-energy) and spinal loading indicators during forward crashes.
Results:
Across 288 simulated crashes, the median normal trunk impact velocity (4.61 m/s) and pseudo-energy (48 J) aligned with current test standards, while substantial tangential (5.97 m/s) and rotational (4.90 rad/s) components were also observed. Three main impact types emerged: head-thorax impacts (43.5%), involving a head impact followed by chest impact (Vn: 5.42 m/s, Emax: 59 J); tumbling (25.1%), featuring a head impact followed by back impact (Vn: 3.98 m/s, Emax: 57 J); and overflip-back impacts (20.7%), involving direct back contact (Vn: 3.35 m/s, Emax: 47 J).
Conclusion:
This study's results define trunk impact conditions during MTB crashes, informing on realistic boundary conditions for testing and designing back protectors.
