Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perception and knowledge of Fabry disease: a comparative survey of patients and medical professionals in South Korea.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Refining the Predictive Accuracy of Membranous Urethral Length for Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Standardized Approach in the Korean Population.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Clinical Benefit and Remaining Risks of Kidney Transplantation in Older Patients: A Matched Comparison With CKD Patients.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·2026
Same author

Effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab treatment for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

Kidney research and clinical practice·2026
Same author

Urine output on the day of continuous renal replacement therapy discontinuation predicts long-term outcomes in patients with severe acute kidney injury.

Kidney research and clinical practice·2026
Same author

Executive summary of evidence-based clinical practice guideline for Fabry nephropathy.

Kidney research and clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Correction: Adeluola et al. Chemoprevention of 4-NQO-Induced Oral Cancer by the Combination of Resveratrol and EGCG: In Vivo, In Silico and In Vitro Studies. <i>Cancers</i> 2026, <i>18</i>, 1098.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Peñalver et al. Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Patients with Follicular Lymphoma-Spanish Lymphoma Group (GELTAMO) 2026. <i>Cancers</i> 2026, <i>18</i>, 395.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Accorsi Buttini et al. Development of a Simplified Geriatric Score-4 (SGS-4) to Predict Outcomes After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients Aged over 50. <i>Cancers</i> 2025, <i>17</i>, 3278.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Age-Stratified Long-Term Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Stage IV Melanoma and NSCLC in The Netherlands: A Population-Based Study.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Targeting Ferroptosis in Glioblastoma: Molecular Mechanisms, Tumor Microenvironment, and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy-Based Treatment Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Resectable Locally Advanced dMMR/MSI-H Gastric Cancer: A Real-World Study with Meta-Analysis.

Cancers·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 27, 2026

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
07:25

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Published on: March 6, 2018

Multi-Model Machine Learning for Survival Predictions for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Tae Jin Kim1, Jaeyun Jeong2, Young Jin Ahn3

  • 1Department of Urology, CHA University Ilsan Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Goyang 10414, Republic of Korea.

Cancers
|June 26, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning models, including random survival forests (RSF) and XGBoost, accurately predict survival in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients. These tools offer interpretable insights for personalized treatment planning.

Keywords:
castration-resistantmachine learningprediction algorithmsprostatic neoplamssurvival

More Related Videos

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 27, 2026

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
07:25

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Published on: March 6, 2018

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Accurate survival prediction is crucial for optimizing treatment in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
  • Traditional models struggle with complex data interactions and limited variable inclusion.
  • Machine learning (ML) offers potential for improved prognostic accuracy in CRPC.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and compare ML models for predicting cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) in CRPC patients.
  • To evaluate the performance and interpretability of various ML algorithms for survival prediction.
  • To identify key predictors of survival outcomes in CRPC.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 46 variables from 801 CRPC patients.
  • Development of ML models: Random Survival Forests (RSF), XGBoost, LightGBM, and logistic regression.
  • Performance evaluation using C-index, AUC, accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and SHAP for interpretability.

Main Results:

  • RSF achieved the highest C-index for CSM (0.772) and OM (0.771) in the test set.
  • RSF excelled in 2-year survival prediction, while XGBoost was superior for 3-year survival prediction (F1-score).
  • Key predictors identified: time to first-line CRPC treatment, hemoglobin, and alkaline phosphatase levels.

Conclusions:

  • RSF provides robust time-to-event prediction, and XGBoost offers complementary value for 3-year survival classification in CRPC.
  • Developed ML models offer accurate and interpretable prognostic tools for personalized treatment strategies.
  • External validation and integration of new therapies are needed for broader clinical application.