Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

06:18
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
Trust in Context: A Three-Factor Experimental Study
1School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Harbin Engineering University, No. 145, Nantong Street, Nangang District, Harbin 150001, China.
Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|June 26, 2026
Summary
Trust intention is shaped by who you know, the importance of the matter, and the trustee's character. These factors interact, showing trust is contextual, not linear.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
- Decision Sciences
Background:
- Existing trust research often overlooks context and multi-factor interactions.
- Rational choice theory and relational logic inadequately explain trust dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how relationship type, entrusted matter, and trustee attributes influence trust intention.
- To examine the interactive effects of these factors on trust.
Main Methods:
- A within-subjects situational experiment with 252 participants.
- Manipulation of relationship type, entrusted matter value, and trustee attributes.
- Analysis using Friedman test and Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE).
Main Results:
- Trust intention is significantly affected by relationship type, entrusted matter importance, and trustee attributes.
- Significant interaction effects were found among these three factors.
- Trust is demonstrated to be a contextual outcome influenced by multiple interacting elements.
Conclusions:
- Trust intention is not a linear result but a contextual outcome.
- Relationship type, entrusted matter, and trustee attributes jointly shape trust.
- This study offers contextualized evidence on trust formation.
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
Confirmation Biases
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Factorial Design
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...
Trait Centrality
Trait centrality refers to the degree to which a particular characteristic influences the overall impression of an individual. Some traits exert a disproportionately strong impact on perception, shaping how people interpret other attributes of a person. Solomon Asch first systematically studied this phenomenon in 1946.Asch’s Experiment on Trait CentralityAsch's seminal study demonstrated the centrality of certain traits through a controlled experiment. Participants were presented with a list of...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...

