Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Randomized Controlled Trial to Study the Acute Effects of Strength Exercise on Insulin Sensitivity in Obese Adults
Published on: December 1, 2023
Yoga and High-Intensity Interval Training Show Comparable Effects on HbA1c in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review
Saw Ye Win Thu1, Sneha Patnaik1, Yin-Hwa Shih1
1Department of Healthcare Administration, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan.
None:
Background/Objectives: Exercise is pivotal for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), yet the relative efficacy of various exercise modalities remains inconclusive. This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate and provide a preliminary ranking of exercise interventions on HbA1c levels in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus, to facilitate clinically relevant network comparisons and to generate evidence for future large-scale comparative trials. Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and ProQuest) were searched from inception to Dec 2024. Randomized controlled trials evaluating exercise interventions in adults with T2DM were included. Risk of bias was assessed independently by two reviewers using the JBI critical appraisal tool. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c level. Results: Six randomized controlled trials involving a total of 511 participants (256 in the treatment group and 255 in the control group) were included in the final analysis. Both high-intensity interval training (MD = -0.322; 95% CI: -0.559 to -0.084; p = 0.008) and yoga (MD = -0.366; 95% CI: -0.534 to -0.198; p < 0.001) significantly reduced HbA1c compared with the active control. Although the preliminary ranking analysis suggested a higher probability of effectiveness for yoga (SUCRA 1) than for HIIT (SUCRA 0.5), the indirect comparison revealed no statistically significant difference in HbA1c reduction between the two interventions (MD = -0.044; 95% CI: -0.335 to 0.247; p = 0.766). Conclusions: These findings provide preliminary, evidence-generating; however, given the sparse network and absence of head-to-head trials, the treatment hierarchy should be interpreted with extreme caution and selected based on patients' preferences and tolerance. Registration: PROSPERO [CRD42025650162].
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Type II Diabetes II: Pathophysiology
Carbohydrate Metabolism
Starch accounts for approximately 60% of the carbohydrates consumed by humans. Since amylase enzymes cannot function in the stomach's acidic environment, starch can only be digested in the mouth and small intestine. Simple sugars are found naturally in milk and fruits in the...
Type II Diabetes I: Introduction
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...