Post-Acute Care Pathways After Sexual Violence and Intimate Partner Violence: An International Health-Services...

Background/Objectives: Survivors of sexual violence and domestic violence/intimate partner violence (IPV) often require support beyond the immediate emergency encounter; however, post-acute care remains inconsistently defined, unevenly organised or conceptualised, and fragmented across service systems. This scoping review mapped international post-acute follow-up, care, assistance, and support pathways, with particular attention to organisational models, continuity mechanisms, loss to follow-up after first access, and implications for the Italian context. Methods: We conducted an international health-services scoping review of post-acute follow-up, care, assistance, and support interventions for survivors of sexual violence and domestic violence/IPV. Searches were performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, APA PsycINFO via EBSCOhost, and CINAHL via EBSCOhost. Eligible studies were published from 2013 onward and had to describe an identifiable post-acute component beyond the initial emergency, forensic, or first-contact phase. The review followed a Population-Concept-Context framework and was reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR. Results: Forty-four studies were included in the core synthesis, comprising 16 studies on sexual violence/sexual assault, 27 on domestic violence/IPV, and one mixed domestic, family, and sexual violence outreach model. The sexual violence literature clustered around early trauma-focused interventions, sexual assault care centre pathways, medical follow-up, follow-up attendance, and digital continuity tools. The IPV literature was broader and included psychotherapy, advocacy and case-management models, housing-first and trauma-informed stabilisation approaches, nurse-led and clinic-based services, outreach and safety-contact programmes, digital interventions, and programmes for system-involved survivors. Across both fields, the pathways most consistently described as supporting continuity combined structured re-contact, coordinated support, and multi-component responses over time. Conclusions: The mapped literature supports conceptualising post-acute responses to sexual violence and domestic violence/IPV as continuity pathways that extend beyond first contact and link healthcare, psychological, advocacy, and social supports. Systems may be better positioned to support continuity when they provide structured follow-up, warm handoffs, coordinated navigation, and context-sensitive recovery models. These findings point to provisional, evidence-informed organisational questions for strengthening post-acute pathways, including in Italy, particularly around structured re-contact, warm handoffs, survivor navigation, and integration between healthcare, anti-violence, psychological, and territorial social-support services.