Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
Performance-Boosted Interpretable ML via Optuna-SHAP: Uncovering Orientation-Driven Twinning in Mg Alloys
Xuanyu Liu1,2, Guoyao Chen3, Xueting Wang2,4
1College of Interdisciplinary Sciences, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 121001, China.
Abstract:
Machine learning (ML) is highly effective for modeling the complex factors governing twinning in magnesium (Mg) alloys, but it is often limited by challenges in hyperparameter optimization and a lack of interpretability, which reduce predictive accuracy and hinder mechanistic understanding. In this work, we present an enhanced interpretable ML framework that integrates Optuna for automated hyperparameter tuning using tree-structured Parzen estimators and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for quantitative feature attribution. This approach delivers significant performance improvements, including F1-score gains of 6.33-11.84% on dataset T and AUC increases of up to 16.31% on dataset Y, outperforming previous benchmarks. When applied to a custom dataset derived from in situ EBSD tensile tests on Mg alloys and complemented by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, SHAP analysis reveals a previously unrecognized grain shape-orientation effect: elongated grains with long-axis orientations of 20-80° relative to the tensile direction facilitate twinning nucleation, whereas orientations of 0-20° or 80-90° suppress it. Combined EBSD observations and MD simulations indicate that this effect arises from changes in boundary-segment orientation combinations, which regulate local constraint conditions, stress-transfer paths, and effective boundary resistance.
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy
Methods of Medium Optimization
Inductive Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview
Bonding in Metals
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
