Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Beyond the Stent ("Leave-Nothing-Behind") Drug-Coated Balloons in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Narrative Review
Sheref Zaghloul1, Ahmed Shahin2, Salaheldin Agamy3
1Cardiology Department, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading RG1 5AN, UK.
Insights
Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) offer a viable alternative to drug-eluting stents (DES) for select acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, especially those with high bleeding risk. Further research is needed for broader recommendations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) represent a "leave-nothing-behind" approach in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- DCBs show potential advantages over drug-eluting stents (DES) in specific acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patient groups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current evidence on DCB therapy for ACS.
- To compare DCB outcomes with DES in ACS patients.
Main Methods:
- Narrative review of randomized controlled trials, registries, and meta-analyses.
- Searched major biomedical databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL) from January 2005 to February 2026.
- Included studies like PEPCAD NSTEMI, REVELATION, BASKET-SMALL 2, AGENT IDE, REC-CAGEFREE I/II, and TRANSFORM II.
Main Results:
- DCBs demonstrated non-inferior outcomes compared to DES in selected ACS subsets.
- DCBs were associated with a reduced risk of major bleeding due to shorter dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration.
- Emerging adjunctive technologies like intravascular imaging, AI, and robotic-assisted PCI may enhance DCB performance, but specific ACS evidence is limited.
Conclusions:
- DCBs are a suitable alternative to DES for selected ACS patients, particularly those at high bleeding risk or with challenging lesion types (small vessels, in-stent restenosis, bifurcations, diffuse disease).
- Larger randomized trials with long-term follow-up are necessary to support wider adoption and recommendations.
Abstract:
Background: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged as a "leave-nothing-behind" strategy in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with potential advantages over drug-eluting stents (DES) in selected patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: We performed a narrative review of randomized controlled trials, registries, and meta-analyses evaluating DCB therapy in ACS, including PEPCAD NSTEMI, REVELATION, BASKET-SMALL 2, AGENT IDE, REC-CAGEFREE I/II, and the ongoing TRANSFORM II trial. Articles were identified through searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL covering January 2005 to February 2026. Results: Across published studies, DCBs have shown outcomes that are non-inferior to those of DES in selected ACS subsets, together with a lower risk of major bleeding attributable to shorter dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) requirements. Advances in intravascular imaging and lesion preparation, alongside emerging applications of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotic-assisted PCI, may further improve DCB performance, although evidence specific to DCB use in ACS remains limited for these adjunctive technologies. Conclusions: DCBs are a reasonable alternative to DES in selected patients with ACS, particularly those at high bleeding risk or with lesion subsets in which DES perform less well (small vessels, in-stent restenosis, bifurcations, diffuse disease). Adequately powered randomized trials with long-term follow-up are required before broader recommendations can be made.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Angina IV: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies