Biomimetic Material Selection for Therapeutic Microneedles: An Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Multi-Criteria...

Microneedles are a new technology in transdermal drug delivery that allows for the pain-free administration of drugs. Recently, these microneedles have gained popularity compared to traditional injections. Nevertheless, the selection of the most suitable materials is a significant issue, requiring a systematic analysis of various performance parameters. This paper developed a multi-criteria decision-making model based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to systematically evaluate four primary material types for therapeutic microneedle applications: polymers, metals, ceramics, and silicon. The researchers defined five performance criteria, ranked by importance: biocompatibility (48.8%), mechanical properties (25.3%), manufacturability (15.8%), cost-effectiveness (6.6%), and compatibility with different types of microneedles (3.5%). The validity of the framework was established using the TOPSIS and ELECTRE methods, which showed strong agreement in the rankings, and a sensitivity analysis revealed that the rankings did not change with a ±20% variation in the parameters in 95% of the cases. The outcomes indicated that polymers are the most suitable, with the highest global priority score (38.3%), and they are good in biocompatibility (53.0% local priority), manufacturability (53.3%), and relative cost advantages (62.2%), though medical-grade polymer costs remain substantial. Metals were placed second (31.8%) due to their better mechanical properties (50.3%), followed by ceramics (17.6%) and silicon-based materials (12.3%). The framework offers clear decision guidelines: polymers for dissolving microneedle systems and controlled drug release applications; metals for precise liquid delivery devices; ceramics for specialized pharmaceutical uses that require extreme chemical compatibility; and silicon for research applications requiring precise geometries.