ViroBioTree: A Tree-Structured Biological Evidence Retrieval Framework for Viral Protein Function Annotation

Accurate viral protein function annotation is essential for genomic surveillance, yet conventional retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines often fragment biological evidence into fixed-length text chunks, disrupting relationships among ORFs, annotations, structural domains, sequence motifs, residue mappings, and model-derived attention evidence. We propose ViroBioTree, a tree-structured biological evidence retrieval framework for downstream viral protein evidence review rather than a new primary annotation classifier. Built as an evidence organization layer on ViralMultiNet-derived ORF-level predictions and annotations, ViroBioTree converts sequence, annotation, structure, and attention evidence into typed biological nodes and traceable edges, then performs deterministic multi-channel recall, evidence-aware reranking, balanced TopK selection, rule-based verification, and node-cited report generation. In a demo benchmark, ViroBioTree achieved its strongest deterministic proxy performance on structure-explanation tasks, with Precision@K = 1.0, Recall@K = 1.0, and diversity = 0.52; these values reflect expected node-type and tag agreement rather than independent biological correctness. A bounded full-scale SARS-CoV-2 index contained 39,800 ORF rows, 80,000 attention records, 199,418 nodes, and 495,886 edges. In a stratified full20k diagnostic evaluation, ViroBioTree showed task-dependent advantages over LlamaIndex vector retrieval for conflict detection, evidence retrieval, and structure explanation, while LlamaIndex remained competitive or stronger for annotation-rich function annotation. A cross-family Influenza A Virus (IAV) diagnostic audit showed that the schema can represent IAV evidence namespaces while explicitly exposing missing formal ORF inputs, missing attention evidence, and unavailable residue/PDB assertions. Supplementary robustness, external sanity-check, diversity-risk, expert-evaluation, domain-tool positioning, and cross-family audit analyses supported traceability, report quality, and conservative evidence handling, but also showed that stable Precision@K under query perturbation does not necessarily imply stable retrieved evidence sets. ViroBioTree operates offline and deterministically, but does not address raw-read assembly, base calling, primary ORF prediction, or wet-lab validation. Its results should be interpreted as proxy and expert-reviewed evidence for traceable viral protein evidence retrieval and report generation rather than as direct validation of biological function annotation.