Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Manufacturing, Control, and Performance Evaluation of a Gecko-Inspired Soft Robot
Published on: June 10, 2020
Ethohydraulic Evidence that Curved Guidance Walls Boost Bypass Efficiency of a Small-bodied Leuciscid
Cumhur Ozbey1, Serhat Kucukali2, Baran Yoğurtçuoğlu3
1Hydraulics Division, Department of Civil Engineering, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract:
Angled racks are widely used at water intakes, yet live-fish evidence on how approach-flow conditioning interacts with fine bar spacing to affect downstream passage of small-bodied species is scarce. We tested whether adding a curved guidance wall to an angled 10 mm fine screen improves approach hydraulics and increases bypass passage probability for the potamodromous leuciscid Alburnoides kosswigi, and whether screen angle (30° vs 45°) or fish length affects outcomes. Ethohydraulic flume experiments incorporated two screen angles and the presence or absence of walls, resulting in four distinct treatments across 120 individual trials. Three-dimensional velocities were mapped with acoustic Doppler velocimetry (ADV) to quantify approach hydraulics, including streamwise spatial velocity gradient (SVGx). Passage success (bypass entry within 30 min) was analysed using binomial GLMs. With the implementation of the guidance wall, the bypass inlet velocity was reduced from 0.94 m/s to 0.65 m/s for α = 30°, and from 0.73 m/s to 0.65 m/s for α = 45°. The SVGx values were reduced to approximately 0.1 s-1 at the bypass inlet, and the normal velocities along the screen were also reduced by the guidance wall. More uniform velocity distributions towards the bypass channel were observed at α = 45° with the guidance wall. Consequently, bypass efficiency increased from 56% to 80% at 30° and from 63% to 90% at 45° with the wall. In models, the wall was the only robust predictor of success (OR 3.95, 95% CI 1.66-10.08), whereas angle and fish length were not significant. However, an exploratory threshold analysis suggested a tentative 96-mm cut-off above which success increased (β = 1.50; p = 0.0595). Overall, the results show that using a curved guidance wall in the conditioning approach flow can increase downstream passage by 25-30% at angled fine screens without increasing entrainment. This suggests that guidance-wall design should be considered in intake standards at poor approach-flow conditions for small-bodied potamodromous fish.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway
Hydrostatic Pressure Force on a Curved Surface
Laminar Flow
Hydraulic Jump
Bernoulli's Equation for Flow Normal to a Streamline
The pressure difference depends on the fluid's velocity and radius of curvature. The pressure variation is minimal in flows with nearly straight streamlines. However, the...
Hydraulic Jump: Problem Solving

