Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Diagnostic yield of the one-year surveillance colonoscopy after curative colorectal cancer resection
Jenna Cross1, Garrett Johnson2, Harminder Singh3
1Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, St. Boniface General Hospital, Z3049 - 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada. crossj3@myumanitoba.ca.
Purpose:
Guidelines recommend routine colonoscopy 1 year after curative colorectal cancer resection, despite limited evidence supporting its diagnostic yield. This study evaluated the real-world outcomes of 1-year surveillance colonoscopy following colorectal cancer resection.
Methods:
This is a retrospective observational study using pathology, clinic, and endoscopy data patients who underwent segmental oncologic resection for primary colon or rectal. Adenocarcinoma between January 2007 and June 2020 in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Patients were excluded if they had a total proctocolectomy, if no follow-up colonoscopy data were available, or if the date of the first surveillance scope was < 6 months or > 24 months from surgery. Colonoscopy findings were categorized as adenocarcinoma, advanced adenoma, simple adenoma or normal.
Results:
A total of 454 patients met the inclusion criteria. The 1-year surveillance colonoscopy detected 2 (0.44%) adenocarcinomas, 3 (0.66%) advanced adenomas, and 87 (19.2%) simple adenomas. The majority (n = 362, 79.7%) had normal colonoscopy results. Preoperative bowel preparation quality was not reported for either recurrent adenocarcinoma. Neither of the recurrent adenocarcinomas was associated with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), abnormal imaging, or known hereditary cancer syndromes.
Conclusions:
Our data demonstrate a low observed rate of clinically significant findings at 1-year surveillance colonoscopy following colorectal cancer resection. Incomplete documentation of index colonoscopy quality limited assessment of whether surveillance findings represented true metachronous lesions or lesions missed at the preoperative examination. Given the low event rate and observational study design, these findings should be interpreted as descriptive real-world data regarding postoperative surveillance outcomes.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023