Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Preliminary Study on Acupuncture Combined with Grain-sized Moxibustion for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis with Finger Joint Pain
Published on: May 16, 2025
Safety of Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A
Kuan Peng1,2, Vincent K C Yan2, Shirley C W Chan1
1Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) show similar safety profiles for rheumatoid arthritis patients over 5 years. This comparative study helps guide safer prescribing by assessing risks of major adverse events.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are effective for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
- These medications carry varying risks of adverse events, necessitating comparative safety assessments.
- Understanding these risks is crucial for optimizing RA management and patient safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the risk of key clinical events across various biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs for rheumatoid arthritis.
- To provide evidence-based guidance for safer prescribing practices in RA treatment.
- To evaluate the comparative safety profiles of different DMARDs in a real-world setting.
Main Methods:
- A population-based cohort study in Hong Kong analyzed RA patients initiated on 12 different DMARDs from 2009-2022.
- Adverse events, including major adverse cardiovascular events, infections, malignancies, and mortality, were assessed over a 5-year period.
- Marginal structural models with inverse probability weighting were used to address confounding and selection bias, with death as a competing risk.
Main Results:
- The 5-year cumulative probabilities of adverse events were broadly comparable across most biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs.
- Tocilizumab was associated with a higher hospitalization risk compared to etanercept (Risk Difference: 0.205).
- Tofacitinib showed a higher risk of gastritis compared to etanercept (Risk Difference: 0.055).
Conclusions:
- Biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs exhibit largely similar safety profiles after rigorous statistical adjustment.
- The study alleviates concerns regarding severe adverse events associated with these RA treatments.
- Findings support clinicians in making informed treatment decisions for rheumatoid arthritis patients based on comparative safety data.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents