Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Integrated Compensatory Responses in a Human Model of Hemorrhage
Published on: November 20, 2016
A novel approach to blood supply in the era of large-scale combat operations
Benjamin J Hazen1, Brian P Staak, John B Holcomb
1U.S. Air Force Medical Service, Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (B.J.H.); U.S. Air Force Medical Service, Department of Anesthesia, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1802 6th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL (B.P.S.); Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1802 6th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL (J.B.H.).
Future large-scale combat operations (LSCOs) against a near-peer adversary are projected to generate casualty volumes far exceeding those experienced during the Global War on Terror. Estimates range from 800 to 3,600 US casualties per day, potentially overwhelming a military medical system optimized for counterinsurgency warfare with rapid evacuation and limited daily losses. Hemorrhage remains the leading cause of preventable battlefield death, and blood is the cornerstone of combat casualty care. Although the military blood system advanced significantly during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts, it was not designed for sustained, high-volume attrition warfare. The Global War on Terror data provides critical insight. Of ∼53,000 wounded service members over two decades, roughly 20% received blood transfusions, leaving nearly 42,500 wounded who did not require transfusions. Extrapolated to a projected 72,000-casualty LSCO scenario, ∼57,500 individuals would constitute a "walking wounded" population-hemodynamically stable casualties who could represent a substantial, immediately available donor pool. We propose institutionalizing a structured "Walking Wounded Blood Bank," in which eligible, stable casualties donate blood before evacuation. In addition, integrating blood donation into routine redeployment processing could further augment supply during protracted conflict. In contrast, harvesting blood from the deceased is biologically unsound, ethically problematic, and mathematically negligible as a scalable solution. Preparation for LSCO requires confronting the arithmetic of mass casualties. Leveraging the walking wounded and redeploying forces as structured donor populations offers a pragmatic, ethical, and operationally feasible strategy to expand transfusion capacity before demand exceeds supply. ( J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2026;101: S143-S145. Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.).
Future large-scale combat operations (LSCOs) against a near-peer adversary are projected to generate casualty volumes far exceeding those experienced during the Global War on Terror. Estimates range from 800 to 3,600 US casualties per day, potentially overwhelming a military medical system optimized for counterinsurgency warfare with rapid evacuation and limited daily losses. Hemorrhage remains the leading cause of preventable battlefield death, and blood is the cornerstone of combat casualty care. Although the military blood system advanced significantly during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts, it was not designed for sustained, high-volume attrition warfare. The Global War on Terror data provides critical insight. Of ∼53,000 wounded service members over two decades, roughly 20% received blood transfusions, leaving nearly 42,500 wounded who did not require transfusions. Extrapolated to a projected 72,000-casualty LSCO scenario, ∼57,500 individuals would constitute a "walking wounded" population-hemodynamically stable casualties who could represent a substantial, immediately available donor pool. We propose institutionalizing a structured "Walking Wounded Blood Bank," in which eligible, stable casualties donate blood before evacuation. In addition, integrating blood donation into routine redeployment processing could further augment supply during protracted conflict. In contrast, harvesting blood from the deceased is biologically unsound, ethically problematic, and mathematically negligible as a scalable solution. Preparation for LSCO requires confronting the arithmetic of mass casualties. Leveraging the walking wounded and redeploying forces as structured donor populations offers a pragmatic, ethical, and operationally feasible strategy to expand transfusion capacity before demand exceeds supply. ( J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2026;101: S143-S145. Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.).
Related Concept Videos
Blood Flow
Veins as Blood Reservoirs
Blood Supply to the Digestive System
Blood Supply to the Digestive System: The splanchnic circulation involves three main arteries: the celiac artery (also known as the celiac trunk) and the superior and inferior mesenteric...
Autoregulation of Blood Flow
Chemical Signaling in Autoregulation
Chemical signaling operates at the precapillary sphincter level, inciting either contraction or relaxation.
Development of Blood Vessels
The initial formation of this system is facilitated by the small amount of yolk present in the ovum and yolk sac. Blood vessels originate from...
Applications of Integration to Find Blood Flow

