Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026
Amplifying and Quantifying HIV-1 RNA in HIV Infected Individuals with Viral Loads Below the Limit of Detection by Standard Clinical Assays
Published on: September 26, 2011
Reactive Fourth-Generation HIV Assays at Low Cut-Off Indices May Be Clinically Misleading in the Obstetric Setting: A
Ezgi Yılmaz1, Nuran Karabulut2, Ayşe İstanbullu-Tosun3
1Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Objectives:
False-positive HIV screen tests have clinical and social consequences when time constrains necessitate interventions before confirmatory results are available, such as in late phases of pregnancy. We conducted this study to test the performance of HIV screening in pregnancy and explore ways to address the challenges caused by false positives.
Methods:
Cases with a reactive fourth-generation HIV screening assay were identified, and the cut-off indices (COIs), confirmatory HIV test results, and pregnancy status at the time of testing were acquired through digital archives of two tertiary centers. These data were used to calculate positive predictive value (PPV) with the standard and alternative COI thresholds.
Results:
Among 904 reactive screens, 58.6% were false positive. Pregnant women (n = 112) had a markedly lower PPV than the rest (12.5% vs 45.5%, P < 0.0001). COI distribution clusters were distinctly apart between false- and true-positive cases (median 1.9 vs 608.0; P < 0.0001). Two COI thresholds, 1.0 (standard) and 3.0 (explorative), were equally sensitive; however, the PPVs were 41.4% and 70.1%, respectively. COI threshold of 15.9 had the best numeric balance with 99.2% sensitivity and 95.4% PPV.
Conclusions:
Reactive fourth-generation HIV screenings among pregnant woman were mostly false positive in a low-prevalence community. This study found alternative COI thresholds to improve PPV without significantly jeopardizing sensitivity.
