Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Determination of the Relative Potency of an Anti-TNF Monoclonal Antibody (mAb) by Neutralizing TNF Using an In Vitro Bioanalytical Method
Published on: September 16, 2017
Anti-TNF immunogenicity in a Middle Eastern inflammatory bowel disease cohort: prevalence, predictors and
Shaima Wasim Khan1, Noorah Al Hosani1, Thaer Khaleel Swaid1
1Department of Gastroenterology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Objective:
Anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) immunogenicity remains a major barrier to treatment persistence in inflammatory bowel disease, yet data from Middle Eastern populations are lacking. We characterised immunogenicity rates, predictors and loss of response mechanisms in a real-world cohort.
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study included 314 anti-TNF treatment courses (212 infliximab, 102 adalimumab) in 248 patients at a tertiary centre in the United Arab Emirates. Immunogenicity was defined by detectable anti-drug antibodies on a drug-tolerant electrochemiluminescent bridging immunoassay with acid dissociation. Drug levels, predictors and loss of response mechanisms were analysed.
Results:
Immunogenicity developed in 28.3% (89/314) of courses over median follow-up of 24.0 months (median time to detection 15.0 months, IQR 8.0-36.0). Infliximab and adalimumab had comparable rates (26.9% vs 31.4%; p=0.425). Immunogenicity-mediated failure was the leading cause of discontinuation (48.4%). Pre-event trough levels were significantly lower in immunogenic courses (median 3.0 vs 14.0 mcg/mL; p<0.001). Exploratory receiver operating characteristic thresholds of 5.3 mcg/mL for infliximab (area under the curve (AUC) 0.880) and 6.4 mcg/mL for adalimumab (AUC 0.861) predicted immunogenicity with high discrimination. On shared frailty Cox regression, prior surgery was the strongest predictor (HR 1.85, 95% CI 0.94 to 3.64; p=0.074). A sensitivity analysis excluding rescued patients strengthened the surgery signal (HR 2.80, 95% CI 1.41 to 5.56; p=0.003). Subcutaneous infliximab showed lower immunogenicity than intravenous infliximab (new starters 1/25 (4.0%), switchers 1/33 (3.0%) vs IV 57/212 (26.9%)); after propensity score matching on five covariates, the difference remained significant (3.8% vs 18.3%; p=0.013), though a new starters-only analysis did not reach significance (p=0.062).
Conclusion:
Immunogenicity patterns in this Middle Eastern cohort are consistent with Western data, supporting pharmacokinetic rather than population-specific determinants. These findings suggest a potential benefit of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring and that subcutaneous infliximab may offer an immunogenic advantage warranting prospective validation.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Crohn's Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Inflammatory Bowel Disease II: Ulcerative Colitis
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
