Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Multiomics Analysis of TMEM200A as a Pan-Cancer Biomarker
Published on: September 15, 2023
Pan-cancer analysis identifies immunoproteasome as the predominant survival-associated component of antigen
Jiun-I Lai1, Chun-Yu Liu2, Yi-Fang Tsai3
1Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Center of Immuno-Oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan; Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Abstract:
Neoantigens are critical targets for cancer immunotherapy, yet the relationship between experimentally validated neoantigen burden and antigen processing machinery (APM) expression in determining clinical outcomes remains unclear. We mapped CEDAR-annotated neoantigens (CENs) onto mutation data from 43,980 patients across 14 cancer types using cBioPortal. APM gene expression was correlated with survival outcomes across 13 cohorts. Machine learning approaches (elastic net stability selection, random survival forest, univariable Cox regression) identified prognostically important APM genes across 11 cohorts. Findings were validated in the IMvigor210 immunotherapy trial (n=348 metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients) and single-cell RNA-sequencing data (GSE161529; n=29 breast cancers). Overall, 40.4% of patients harbored at least one CEN, with high prevalence in pancreatic (>75%) and skin cancers (>70%). CENs predominantly arose from driver oncogenes including PIK3CA, KRAS, BRAF, TP53, and EGFR. High APM expression was associated with improved survival, particularly in CEN-positive tumors. Machine learning identified immunoproteasome components (PSME1, PSMB8, PSMB9, PSMB10) as the dominant prognostic contributors within the 12-gene APM signature. A simplified 4-gene immunoproteasome score performed equivalently to the full APM score in leave-one-cohort-out cross-validation (median C-index 0.545 vs 0.545; p=0.31). In IMvigor210, immunoproteasome-high patients achieved a 3.2-fold higher response rate to atezolizumab (19.8% vs 6.2%; p=0.010). Single-cell analysis confirmed that tumor-intrinsic immunoproteasome expression correlated with increased CD8+ T cell infiltration (p=0.0014) and total immune fraction (p=0.0002). The 4-gene immunoproteasome signature demonstrates robust prognostic and predictive value across bulk sequencing, clinical trial, and single-cell platforms, warranting prospective validation as an immunotherapy biomarker.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Tumor Immunotherapy
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...