Comparative study on typical heavy metal immobilization in cement-based and alkali-activated backfill materials
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Two-way Valorization of Blast Furnace Slag: Synthesis of Precipitated Calcium Carbonate and Zeolitic Heavy Metal Adsorbent
Published on: February 21, 2017
Mengbo Zhu1, Zhenghan Niu2, Lang Liu2
1College of Energy and Mining Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710054, China; State Key Laboratory for Fine Exploration and Intelligent Development of Coal Resources, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221116, China.
Abstract:
Backfill mining effectively disposes of coal-based solid waste, but traditional cement-based backfill materials face challenges regarding carbon emissions and long-term heavy metal immobilization stability. Alkali-activated systems (AAS) offer a green alternative, yet a systematic comparison of their environmental characteristics and micro-immobilization mechanisms against cement systems remains lacking. Herein, cement-based and AAS backfill materials were prepared using coal gangue, fly ash, and desulfurization gypsum. Exogenous heavy metals (Pb2+, Cd2+) were introduced to amplify micro-mechanism signals, systematically investigating mechanical evolution, leaching toxicity, chemical speciation, and pH fluctuations. Results indicate that AAS exhibits superior mechanical robustness against heavy metal interference compared to the non-linear fluctuations of the cement system. Furthermore, AAS demonstrated higher 28-day immobilization efficiency, maintaining over 95% for Pb and Cd even under 0.4 wt% exogenous heavy metal loading, whereas the cement system dropped below 90%. After 120 days of long-term curing, Tessier extraction revealed that both systems convert Pb and Cd into stable residual fractions, with AAS further reducing the exchangeable fractions of coexisting metals (Cr, Cu, Zn). Crucially, the cement system maintained a highly alkaline environment (pH > 11.68) throughout the 120-day monitoring period, risking amphoteric Pb re-dissolution, while the AAS pH decreased to 10.25 within 120 days, ensuring optimal thermodynamic stability. Mechanistically, while the cement system relies on sulfate precipitation for Pb (prone to pore boundary enrichment), AAS achieves deep synergistic immobilization via physical encapsulation, chemical precipitation, and isomorphic substitution within its unique 3D K-A-S-H gel network. This study clarified the differences in the environmental characteristics and immobilization mechanisms of the two backfill materials, providing a theoretical basis for green backfill selection and heavy metal risk control.
Related Concept Videos
Alkali Aggregate Reaction in Concrete
Types of Cement I
Type I (Ordinary Portland Cement) is widely used for general construction where special properties are not required. It has moderate sulfate resistance and heat of hydration.
Type II (Modified Cement) offers moderate resistance to sulfate attack and a lower rate of heat development compared to Type I. It is suitable for structures in...
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in ASTM C...
Soundness of Cement
Testing Water Quality
Types of Cement II
