Baseline inflammatory profiles in moderate-to-severe depression and differential response to intermittent theta-burst

Bruno Pedraz-Petrozzi1, Jonas Wilkening2, Nicole Ziegler3

  • 1Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.; German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), partner site Mannheim, Germany.; INSERM U955, Institut Henri Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Laboratoire Neuro-Psychiatrie Translationnelle, Créteil, France; Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France; French Program on Precision Psychiatry (PEPR PROPSY, 2030), France.

Insights

Inflammation may impact treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). This study found distinct inflammatory protein profiles in patients undergoing intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), differentiating responders from non-responders.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychiatry
  • Immunology

Background:

  • Major depressive disorder (MDD) is biologically diverse, with inflammation linked to poorer treatment outcomes.
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) efficacy varies, potentially influenced by inflammation's effect on neuroplasticity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore if baseline inflammatory protein signatures predict response to intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) in patients with moderate-to-severe MDD.

Main Methods:

  • Analyzed baseline inflammatory proteins in 54 MDD patients using the Olink® Target 96 Inflammation panel.
  • Utilized K-means clustering to identify patient subgroups and differential protein expression analysis (volcano plots, FDR correction).
  • Performed pathway enrichment analysis (KEGG, Reactome) to identify biological processes.

Main Results:

  • Two subgroups were identified; Cluster 2 had a higher response rate to iTBS than Cluster 1.
  • Ten differentially expressed proteins were found between clusters (FDR < 0.05).
  • Enrichment analysis highlighted cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, chemokine signaling, and interleukin signaling in the lower-response subgroup.

Conclusions:

  • Baseline inflammatory signatures may differentiate iTBS treatment response in MDD.
  • Further research into inflammatory pathways could personalize psychiatric treatments.

Related Concept Videos