Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

A Competent Hepatocyte Model Examining Hepatitis B Virus Entry through Sodium Taurocholate Cotransporting Polypeptide as a Therapeutic Target
Published on: May 10, 2022
Comparison of clinical practice guidelines for chronic hepatitis B: natural history classification and treatment
Gi-Ae Kim1, Won-Mook Choi2, Gwang Hyeon Choi3
1Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
New chronic hepatitis B (CHB) guidelines offer updated approaches to patient management. The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver-East Asia Liver Alliance (KASL-EALA) guideline simplifies treatment decisions by focusing on HBV DNA levels, while others retain traditional classifications.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Virology
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background:
- Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) are periodically updated to reflect new evidence.
- Recent updates from major international and regional bodies (KASL-EALA, AASLD, EASL, WHO) address CHB natural history, treatment initiation, and antiviral selection.
- Managing CHB patients, particularly those in the indeterminate or "grey zone" phase, remains complex.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the latest major CPGs for CHB management.
- To highlight key differences and similarities in natural history classification, treatment indications, and antiviral agent selection.
- To inform clinicians and guide future harmonization efforts in CHB care.
Main Methods:
- Comparative review of recent CPGs from KASL-EALA (2026), AASLD (2025), EASL (2025), and WHO (2024).
- Focus on changes in classification of CHB natural history, criteria for initiating antiviral therapy, and choices of antiviral medications.
- Analysis of how each guideline addresses the challenges of the indeterminate phase and treatment decision-making.
Main Results:
- KASL-EALA 2026 introduces a novel framework based on HBV DNA levels, removing the indeterminate category to better correlate with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk and simplify treatment decisions.
- AASLD 2025, EASL 2025, and WHO 2024 maintain traditional immunological phase-based classifications for natural history.
- All guidelines support expanded access to antiviral therapy, with AASLD emphasizing shared decision-making, EASL focusing on individualized risk assessment, and WHO 2024 removing phase-based criteria for treatment decisions.
Conclusions:
- Significant divergence exists among recent CHB guidelines, particularly in natural history classification and treatment decision frameworks.
- The KASL-EALA guideline represents a notable shift towards simplifying management based on viral load.
- Understanding these variations is crucial for clinicians to optimize patient care and contributes to the ongoing global effort to harmonize CHB management strategies.
Abstract:
International and regional clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) have recently been updated to incorporate evolving clinical evidence. This review compares the latest major CPGs regarding natural history classification, treatment initiation, and selection of antiviral agents, specifically focusing on updates from the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver-East Asia Liver Alliance (KASL-EALA), the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), and the World Health Organization (WHO). While all guidelines recognize the heterogeneous and dynamic nature of CHB, managing patients in the "grey zone" or indeterminate phase remains a major challenge. The KASL-EALA 2026 guideline introduces a novel framework based primarily on hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels-independent of alanine aminotransferase criteria-eliminating the indeterminate category to better align with hepatocellular carcinoma risks and simplify treatment decision-making. In contrast, AASLD 2025, EASL 2025, and WHO 2024 retain conventional immunological phase-based classifications for natural history. For treatment indications, all four guidelines advocate broader access to antiviral therapy despite their divergent structural approaches. AASLD suggests shared decision-making, EASL emphasizes individualized risk assessment, and WHO 2024 abandons the phase-based framework for treatment decisions entirely. Understanding these key similarities and differences will help clinicians optimize patient care and inform future efforts toward global harmonization in CHB management.
Related Concept Videos
Hepatitis
Viral Hepatitis I: Introduction
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Cirrhosis I: Introduction
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Diseases of the Liver and Gallbladder
Cirrhosis is characterized by the scarring of hepatic lobules in the liver, which are replaced by fibrous tissue, affecting the liver's normal functioning. NAFLD, on the other hand, is caused by an excessive build-up of fat in the liver, not related to...
