Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genome Annotation and Assembly03:36

Genome Annotation and Assembly

The genome refers to all of the genetic material in an organism. It can range from a few million base pairs in microbial cells to several billion base pairs in many eukaryotic organisms. Genome assembly refers to the process of taking the DNA sequencing data and putting it all back together in a correct order to create a close representation of the original genome. This is followed by the identification of functional elements on the newly assembled genome, a process called genome annotation.
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes02:16

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
Multi-species Conserved Sequences02:51

Multi-species Conserved Sequences

Next-generation sequencing technologies have created large genomic databases of a variety of animals and plants. Ever since the human genome project was completed, scientists studied the genome of primates, mammals, and other phylogenetically distant living beings. Such large-scale  studies have provided new insights into the evolutionary relationship between organisms.
Although the genome of each species varies greatly from each other, a few sequences are highly conserved. Such conserved DNA...
Genomics02:02

Genomics

Genomics is the science of genomes: it is the study of all the genetic material of an organism. In humans, the genome consists of information carried in 23 pairs of chromosomes in the nucleus, as well as mitochondrial DNA. In genomics, both coding and non-coding DNA is sequenced and analyzed. Genomics allows a better understanding of all living things, their evolution, and their diversity. It has a myriad of uses: for example, to build phylogenetic trees, to improve productivity and...
Genomic DNA in Eukaryotes00:58

Genomic DNA in Eukaryotes

Eukaryotes have large genomes compared to prokaryotes. To fit their genomes into a cell, eukaryotic DNA is packaged extraordinarily tightly inside the nucleus. To achieve this, DNA is tightly wound around proteins called histones, which are packaged into nucleosomes that are joined by linker DNA and coil into chromatin fibers. Additional fibrous proteins further compact the chromatin, which is recognizable as chromosomes during certain phases of cell division.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the state of protein function prediction: a report on the fourth CAFA challenge.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Molecular basis and cellular effects of Janus-class-driven cytoplasmic PYK2 coacervates.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Phased genome assemblies and pangenome graphs of human populations of Japan and Saudi Arabia.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

A reference quality, fully annotated diploid genome from a Saudi individual.

Scientific data·2024
Same author

Causal relationships between diseases mined from the literature improve the use of polygenic risk scores.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2024
Same author

Predicting protein functions using positive-unlabeled ranking with ontology-based priors.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2024
Same journal

Transformers for single-cell RNA sequencing: a survey.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

CLABP: a contrastive learning framework integrating protein language models and structural information for antibacterial peptide prediction.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Toward the regularization of E value from BLAST similarity search into a dissimilarity measure as distance function, and the metrication of protein sequence space.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

scDeepAPA: a deep learning framework for single-cell alternative polyadenylation identification.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

scTumorDrug: predicting cell-type-specific drug responses for heterogeneous tumors.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

CanLRHI: a multimodal pretraining model for cell death analysis in cancer pathology based on long-text representation and high-resolution images.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Annotation of Plant Gene Function via Combined Genomics, Metabolomics and Informatics
08:09

Annotation of Plant Gene Function via Combined Genomics, Metabolomics and Informatics

Published on: June 17, 2012

Evaluating completeness, coherence, and consistency of genome-scale function annotations.

Rund Tawfiq1,2, Maxat Kulmanov2,3,4, Robert Hoehndorf1,2,3,4

  • 1Biological and Environmental Sciences & Engineering (BESE) Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, 4700 KAUST, Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia.

Briefings in Bioinformatics
|June 29, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Current protein function annotation methods often overlook biological system context. This study introduces a systems biology framework to evaluate annotation plausibility, finding computational methods lacking biological coherence for genome-scale predictions.

Keywords:
Gene Ontologyfunctional genomicsprotein functionsystems biology

More Related Videos

Comprehensive Workflow for the Genome-wide Identification and Expression Meta-analysis of the ATL E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene Family in Grapevine
10:40

Comprehensive Workflow for the Genome-wide Identification and Expression Meta-analysis of the ATL E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene Family in Grapevine

Published on: December 22, 2017

Introductory Analysis and Validation of CUT&RUN Sequencing Data
04:58

Introductory Analysis and Validation of CUT&RUN Sequencing Data

Published on: December 13, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Annotation of Plant Gene Function via Combined Genomics, Metabolomics and Informatics
08:09

Annotation of Plant Gene Function via Combined Genomics, Metabolomics and Informatics

Published on: June 17, 2012

Comprehensive Workflow for the Genome-wide Identification and Expression Meta-analysis of the ATL E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene Family in Grapevine
10:40

Comprehensive Workflow for the Genome-wide Identification and Expression Meta-analysis of the ATL E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene Family in Grapevine

Published on: December 22, 2017

Introductory Analysis and Validation of CUT&RUN Sequencing Data
04:58

Introductory Analysis and Validation of CUT&RUN Sequencing Data

Published on: December 13, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Systems biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Traditional protein function annotation is reductionist, treating proteins in isolation.
  • This approach disconnects annotations from the integrated biological systems where proteins function within networks and depend on interactions.
  • A systems-level perspective is needed for accurate protein function annotation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and apply a systems biology-based framework for evaluating the biological plausibility of protein function annotations.
  • To assess whether annotated protein functions can coexist within a living organism.

Main Methods:

  • Formalized three systems biology criteria: completeness, coherence, and consistency.
  • Applied the framework to manually curated annotations from six model organisms.
  • Evaluated function predictions from seven computational methods.

Main Results:

  • Manually curated annotations from model organisms largely met the plausibility criteria.
  • Computational function prediction methods systematically failed to generate biologically plausible genome-scale annotations.
  • A significant gap exists between per-protein annotation objectives and system-level requirements.

Conclusions:

  • Current computational methods do not produce system-level biologically plausible annotations.
  • The developed framework provides quantitative metrics for evaluating annotation plausibility.
  • System-aware annotation approaches are crucial for improving genome and metagenome annotation accuracy.