Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Overview of DNA Repair02:25

Overview of DNA Repair

In order to be passed through generations, genomic DNA must be undamaged and error-free. However, every day, DNA in a cell undergoes several thousand to a million damaging events by natural causes and external factors. Ionizing radiation such as UV rays, free radicals produced during cellular respiration, and hydrolytic damage from metabolic reactions can alter the structure of DNA. Damages caused include single-base alteration, base dimerization, chain breaks, and cross-linkage.
Chemically...
Overview of DNA Repair02:25

Overview of DNA Repair

In order to be passed through generations, genomic DNA must be undamaged and error-free. However, every day, DNA in a cell undergoes several thousand to a million damaging events by natural causes and external factors. Ionizing radiation such as UV rays, free radicals produced during cellular respiration, and hydrolytic damage from metabolic reactions can alter the structure of DNA. Damages caused include single-base alteration, base dimerization, chain breaks, and cross-linkage.
Chemically...
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle02:36

DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle

In response to DNA damage, cells can pause the cell cycle to assess and repair the breaks. However, the cell must check the DNA at certain critical stages during the cell cycle. If the cell cycle pauses before DNA replication, the cells will contain twice the amount of DNA. On the other hand, if cells arrest after DNA replication but before mitosis, they will contain four times the normal amount of DNA. With a host of specialized proteins at their disposal,cells must use the right protein at...
DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle02:36

DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle

In response to DNA damage, cells can pause the cell cycle to assess and repair the breaks. However, the cell must check the DNA at certain critical stages during the cell cycle. If the cell cycle pauses before DNA replication, the cells will contain twice the amount of DNA. On the other hand, if cells arrest after DNA replication but before mitosis, they will contain four times the normal amount of DNA. With a host of specialized proteins at their disposal,cells must use the right protein at...
Genome Copying Errors02:46

Genome Copying Errors

DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger theirĀ  survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
Base Excision Repair01:54

Base Excision Repair

One of the common DNA damages is the chemical alteration of single bases by alkylation, oxidation, or deamination. The altered bases cause mispairing and strand breakage during replication. This type of damage causes minimal change to the DNA double helix structure and can be repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathways. BER corrects damaged DNA sequences by removing the damaged base and restoring the original base sequence using the complementary strand as a template.
The first step of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A foundational quantum framework for multi-pattern string matching in k-mer detection.

Frontiers in bioinformaticsĀ·2026
Same author

Comprehensive Bioinformatic Characterization of CD70, CD80, and TIGIT as Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Immune Biomarkers in Pan-Cancer.

Current issues in molecular biologyĀ·2026
Same author

The cumulative impact of passenger mutations on cancer development.

Nature communicationsĀ·2026
Same author

Factors Associated with Stage at Diagnosis in Pancreatic Cancer: Implications for Precision Screening and Early Detection.

BiomedicinesĀ·2026
Same author

Characterization of Hairpin Loops and Cruciforms Across 118,019 Genomes Spanning the Tree of Life.

Genome biology and evolutionĀ·2026
Same author

BEDCrypt: Privacy-preserving interval analytics with homomorphic encryption.

ArXivĀ·2026
Same journal

Mechanistic mathematical model of the in vitro infection dynamics of Bunyamwera and Batai viruses including MOI-dependent shortening of the eclipse phase.

ArXivĀ·2026
Same journal

AI-Driven Lumped-Element Modeling of Human Respiratory System for Studying Voice Mechanics.

ArXivĀ·2026
Same journal

Beyond Algorithms: Conceptual Innovation in Medical Imaging AI.

ArXivĀ·2026
Same journal

Feynman Kac Reweighted Schrƶdinger Bridge Matching for Surface-Based Tau PET Harmonization.

ArXivĀ·2026
Same journal

Agentic Discovery of Non-Canonical Antimicrobial Peptides with AMPGAN v3.

ArXivĀ·2026
Same journal

Accuracy, Repeatability, and Reproducibility of a Radiographic Technique to Assess Spinal Cord Stimulation Lead Position: A Validation Study.

ArXivĀ·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 30, 2026

CIRCLE-Seq for Interrogation of Off-Target Gene Editing
08:23

CIRCLE-Seq for Interrogation of Off-Target Gene Editing

Published on: November 1, 2024

Poisoning the Genome: Targeted Backdoor Attacks on DNA Foundation Models.

Charalampos Koilakos, Ioannis Mouratidis, Ilias Georgakopoulos-Soares

    Arxiv
    |June 29, 2026
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Genomic foundation models are vulnerable to data poisoning attacks, where even a small percentage of malicious data can degrade performance on specific biological tasks. This highlights the need for robust data integrity checks in AI model development.

    More Related Videos

    Genome-Wide CRISPR Screen for Unveiling Radiosensitive and Radioresistant Genes
    08:32

    Genome-Wide CRISPR Screen for Unveiling Radiosensitive and Radioresistant Genes

    Published on: May 23, 2025

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 30, 2026

    CIRCLE-Seq for Interrogation of Off-Target Gene Editing
    08:23

    CIRCLE-Seq for Interrogation of Off-Target Gene Editing

    Published on: November 1, 2024

    Genome-Wide CRISPR Screen for Unveiling Radiosensitive and Radioresistant Genes
    08:32

    Genome-Wide CRISPR Screen for Unveiling Radiosensitive and Radioresistant Genes

    Published on: May 23, 2025

    Area of Science:

    • Genomics
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Bioinformatics

    Background:

    • Foundation models trained on DNA sequences excel at biological tasks like variant effect prediction.
    • These models utilize massive genomic datasets, but DNA's lack of semantic transparency hinders detection of corrupted data.
    • Genomic data curation faces challenges in identifying adversarial entries.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To systematically investigate data poisoning vulnerabilities in genomic language models.
    • To assess the impact of poisoning during both pre-training and fine-tuning stages.
    • To evaluate the susceptibility of models to targeted attacks on specific genomic features and tasks.

    Main Methods:

    • Investigated data poisoning in Evo 2 and GENERator architectures during pre-training.
    • Simulated attacks by corrupting TATA-box motifs, CTCF binding sites, and inserting synthetic sequences.
    • Explored fine-tuning attacks including backdoor installation via CTCF site poisoning and label corruption for variant classification.

    Main Results:

    • Less than 1% poisoned data at pre-training selectively degraded generative performance on targeted genomic contexts.
    • Fine-tuning attacks successfully installed conditional backdoors and compromised variant classification tasks (e.g., BRCA1).
    • Genomic foundation models demonstrated susceptibility to targeted data poisoning with minimal footprint.

    Conclusions:

    • Genomic foundation models are vulnerable to sophisticated data poisoning attacks.
    • The findings underscore the critical need for enhanced data security and validation in AI for genomics.
    • Recommended adopting data provenance tracking, integrity verification, and adversarial robustness evaluation.