Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Action Observation Training in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
Testing for treatment effect twice using internal and external controls in clinical trials.
Yanyao Yi1, Ying Zhang1, Yu Du1
1Global Statistical Sciences, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, United States.
Leveraging external controls in clinical trials can reduce costs and increase patient access to new treatments. A new sensitivity analysis method quantifies potential unmeasured bias when using external controls, ensuring reliable study conclusions.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Design
- Health Economics
Background:
- External controls, including real-world data, offer potential cost savings and broader access to novel treatments in clinical trials.
- However, the lack of randomization in external controls can introduce unmeasured biases, potentially affecting study outcomes.
- Existing methods may struggle to account for these unmeasured differences between randomized controlled trial (RCT) patients and external controls.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a novel sensitivity analysis approach for quantifying unmeasured bias when incorporating external controls into clinical trials.
- To develop a combined testing procedure that balances the benefits of using external controls with the risks of unmeasured bias.
- To provide a robust method for data fusion problems, ensuring reliable treatment effect estimation.
Main Methods:
- Developed a sensitivity analysis to determine the magnitude of unmeasured bias required to change study conclusions.
- Proposed a combined testing procedure performing analyses with and without external controls, with a small correction for multiple testing.
- Utilized the joint distribution of test statistics for a robust statistical approach.
Main Results:
- The sensitivity analysis quantifies the impact of potential unmeasured biases, allowing researchers to assess the reliability of conclusions drawn from external controls.
- The combined testing procedure offers substantial power gains when external controls are beneficial, while minimizing power loss otherwise.
- The method demonstrated effectiveness in theoretical evaluations, power calculations, and application to a real clinical trial.
Conclusions:
- The proposed sensitivity analysis and combined testing procedure provide a reliable framework for leveraging external controls in clinical trials.
- This approach enhances the validity of studies using external data by addressing potential unmeasured biases.
- The method supports informed decision-making in data fusion, optimizing the use of external controls for robust clinical trial evidence.
Related Concept Videos
Controls in Experiments
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Blinding
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
