Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under both the...
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
Binomial Probability Distribution01:15

Binomial Probability Distribution

A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prognostic host phenotypes based on body composition and systemic inflammation predict survival in patients with resected pancreatic and periampullary cancer.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2026
Same author

Clinical impact of medication reconciliation on physicians' treatment policies at outpatient clinics: a cross-sectional study.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

Center-specific Federated Learning for Radiation Pneumonitis:A Cross-Center Adaptive Alternating Framework.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered imaging for objective psoriasis severity assessment at home: Feasibility and reliability in a randomized clinical trial.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2026
Same author

The Effect of Mobile Health Intervention on Prelacteal Feeding Among Mothers in the First Month After Birth in South Ethiopia: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Nutrients·2026
Same author

Uncovering Topics in Dutch Patient Messages in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comparative Study of Embedding Models for Neural Topic Modeling.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 30, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Multinomial Classification Certainty: a new uncertainty metric for multinomial outcome prediction.

Florian van Daalen1,2, Ralph Brecheisen1, Leonard Wee1

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, University Maastricht Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Progress in Artificial Intelligence
|June 29, 2026
PubMed
Summary

We introduce Multinomial Classification Certainty, a new metric for machine learning models. This measure quantifies prediction certainty, crucial for applications like medical diagnosis where confidence is key.

Keywords:
Border detectionImage segmentationPredictive certaintyUncertaintyUncertainty measure

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 30, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Data Science
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Machine learning model performance is often evaluated by accuracy, focusing on average results.
  • In critical applications like healthcare, understanding the certainty of individual predictions is more important than average performance.
  • Current models often output only the highest probability class, obscuring prediction certainty, especially with multiple classes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the limitations of existing metrics in quantifying prediction certainty for machine learning models.
  • To introduce a novel metric, Multinomial Classification Certainty, for assessing the confidence of model classifications.
  • To mathematically define and explain the significance of thresholds within the proposed certainty metric.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a novel metric termed Multinomial Classification Certainty.
  • Analysis of existing machine learning model outputs and their limitations in representing classification certainty.
  • Mathematical formulation and exploration of the properties of the new certainty metric.

Main Results:

  • Existing metrics like accuracy do not adequately represent the certainty of individual machine learning predictions.
  • The proposed Multinomial Classification Certainty metric provides a quantifiable measure of confidence for model classifications.
  • The study elucidates the mathematical underpinnings and interpretation of thresholds for this new certainty measure.

Conclusions:

  • A new metric, Multinomial Classification Certainty, is proposed to accurately reflect the confidence of machine learning predictions.
  • This metric is vital for practical applications, particularly in fields requiring high-stakes decision-making.
  • The developed metric offers a more informative approach to understanding model certainty beyond simple probability outputs.