Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

06:04
Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Clinical Experience of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve-In-Ring Interventions With Incomplete Rings: Transjugular and
Leo Kar Lok Lai1, Jonathan X Fang1, Hussayn Alrayes1
1Center for Structural Heart Disease, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Structural Heart : the Journal of the Heart Team
|June 29, 2026
Summary
Tricuspid valve-in-ring procedures are feasible using balloon-expandable valves. The transjugular approach demonstrated higher procedural success and fewer complications compared to the transfemoral route for this intervention.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Tricuspid valve-in-ring procedures are emerging as an option for patients with degenerated tricuspid valve annuloplasty rings.
- Transcatheter valve replacement techniques are advancing, offering less invasive options for structural heart disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of tricuspid valve-in-ring implantation using balloon-expandable valves.
- To compare the transjugular and transfemoral access routes for this procedure.
Main Methods:
- A small single-center series involving patients undergoing tricuspid valve-in-ring implantation.
- Utilized balloon-expandable valves via both transjugular and transfemoral approaches.
- Assessed procedural success, access-site complications, and paravalvular leak rates.
Main Results:
- Procedural success was higher with the transjugular approach (86%) versus transfemoral (60%).
- Transjugular access had no access-site complications, while transfemoral had a 20% groin complication rate.
- Paravalvular leak rates were lower with transjugular (29%) compared to transfemoral access (60%).
- Paravalvular leak varied by ring type, being most frequent with rigid rings and lowest with flexible bands.
Conclusions:
- Tricuspid valve-in-ring implantation is feasible via both transjugular and transfemoral routes.
- The transjugular approach appears superior regarding procedural success, access-site complications, and paravalvular leak.
- Ring characteristics influence paravalvular leak, suggesting careful device selection is crucial.
