Bridging the Gap between Literature and Practice: Nationwide Outcomes of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided

David M de Jong1, Lydi M J W van Driel1, Jurriën G P Reijnders1

  • 1Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyErasmus MC University Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands.

Insights

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepatico-gastrostomy (EUS-HGS) showed modest success rates in a nationwide Dutch study. Further research is needed to enhance patient selection and procedural techniques for this complex biliary drainage method.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Interventional Endoscopy
  • Biliary Interventions

Background:

  • Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepatico-gastrostomy (EUS-HGS) offers internal biliary drainage for patients with complex anatomy or obstruction.
  • The procedure is technically demanding and primarily performed at specialized centers.
  • Existing evidence often comes from selected cohorts, potentially overestimating real-world efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the real-world outcomes of EUS-HGS in a nationwide cohort.
  • To assess technical success, clinical success, complications, and survival following EUS-HGS.

Main Methods:

  • Nationwide retrospective cohort study of all EUS-HGS attempts in the Netherlands (2009-2025).
  • Exclusion of patients participating in prospective studies.
  • Primary outcome: technical success. Secondary outcomes: clinical success, complications, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and overall survival.

Main Results:

  • Technical success was achieved in 77% (81/105) of patients.
  • Clinical success was 60% in the intention-to-treat analysis (63/105).
  • Complications occurred in 15% (procedural) and 16% (postprocedural); 28% experienced RBO.

Conclusions:

  • Real-world technical and clinical success rates for EUS-HGS are modest compared to expert center data.
  • There is a need for prospective studies to optimize patient selection, stent strategies, and procedural safety.