Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Identifying developmental vulnerability through linear growth screening: a UK cross-sectional study
Michael Papasavva1, Joanna Orr1, Isabella Cordani1
1Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Insights
Being short for genetic potential, not just stunting, identifies children at higher risk for developmental vulnerability. This finding suggests incorporating parental heights into growth monitoring can help flag neurodevelopmental concerns earlier.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Child Development
- Public Health
Background:
- Linear growth is routinely monitored in UK children.
- Early identification of neurodevelopmental vulnerability is crucial, especially in diverse urban settings.
- The link between linear growth faltering and neurodevelopmental risk is not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether short stature (stunting) or being short for genetic potential flags children at risk of developmental vulnerability.
- To assess children aged 2-2.5 years using routine developmental screening.
- To inform early neurodevelopmental review strategies.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional analysis of 555 children (24-30 months) in East London.
- Developmental vulnerability defined by Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3) cut-offs.
- Exposures: stunting (height-for-age z-score <-2 SD) and short for genetic potential (deviation from mid-parental height [DMPH] <-2 SD).
- Logistic regression adjusted for covariates; Griffiths III Mental Development Scales (GMDS-III) used for validation.
Main Results:
- 25.4% of children screened positive for developmental vulnerability.
- No association found between stunting and developmental vulnerability (aOR 1.35).
- Children short for genetic potential showed significantly higher odds of developmental vulnerability (aOR 4.18).
Conclusions:
- Deviation from genetic height potential, not stunting, is a key indicator of increased neurodevelopmental vulnerability risk in urban UK children.
- Integrating parental height measurements into routine growth surveillance may provide an early trigger for neurodevelopmental assessment.
- This approach could enhance early identification and intervention for at-risk children.
Introduction:
Linear growth in early childhood is routinely measured in the UK, but it is unclear whether indicators of linear growth faltering can flag children with neurodevelopmental vulnerability, especially in ethnically diverse urban settings. We tested whether short stature (stunting) or being short for genetic potential identifies children at risk of failing routine developmental screening at age 2-2.5 years.
Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis among 555 children aged 24-30 months (mean 26.0 months, SD 1.5) attending Healthy Child Programme reviews in East London. The sample was ethnically diverse, with substantial proportions of Bangladeshi, White and other minority ethnic groups. Developmental vulnerability was defined as scoring below the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition (ASQ-3) cut-off in ≥1 domain. The exposures were stunting (height-for-age z score <-2 SD) and being short for genetic potential, defined as deviation from mid-parental height (DMPH) <-2 SD. Associations were examined using binomial multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, prematurity, maternal education, ethnicity and household benefits. A subset (n=94) completed the Griffiths III Mental Development Scales (GMDS-III) to validate ASQ-3 classification.
Results:
Overall, 141/555 (25.4%) children screened positive for developmental vulnerability on the ASQ-3. Children with developmental vulnerability had significantly lower GMDS-III scaled scores across multiple domains supporting criterion validity. We did not find evidence of an association between stunting and developmental vulnerability (adjusted OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.47 to 3.49). In contrast, children who were short for genetic potential (DMPH <-2 SD) had higher odds of developmental vulnerability (adjusted OR 4.18, 95% CI 1.13 to 14.78).
Conclusions:
In this urban UK cohort, deviation from genetic height potential, rather than stunting, identified children at increased risk of developmental vulnerability. Incorporating parental heights into routine growth surveillance could offer a simple trigger for earlier neurodevelopmental review.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Developmental Psychology
Longitudinal Research
Longitudinal Studies
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...

