Related Experiment Videos
A pipeline for enabling path-specific causal fairness in observational health data
Aparajita Kashyap1, Sara Matijevic2, Noémie Elhadad1
1Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, USA.
Summary
This study introduces a pipeline for training causally fair machine learning models in healthcare. It addresses both direct and indirect biases, improving fairness without sacrificing accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Machine Learning
- Causal Inference
Background:
- Machine learning (ML) models in healthcare risk perpetuating existing biases.
- Existing fairness definitions may not fully capture complex healthcare contexts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a generalizable pipeline for training causally fair ML models in observational healthcare settings.
- To address both direct and indirect sources of bias in ML models.
- To leverage foundation models for causally fair predictions.
Main Methods:
- Mapping structural fairness models to observational healthcare data.
- Developing a pipeline that incorporates healthcare context and disparities.
- Detangling direct and indirect bias sources to assess fairness-accuracy tradeoffs.
- Utilizing foundation models for downstream fair predictions.
Main Results:
- A model-agnostic pipeline for training causally fair ML models is presented.
- The pipeline effectively addresses both direct and indirect healthcare biases.
- Expanded characterizations of the fairness-accuracy tradeoff are provided.
Conclusions:
- The developed pipeline offers a method for creating fairer ML models in healthcare.
- This approach can mitigate biases stemming from clinical decisions and systemic disparities.
- Foundation models can be adapted for causally fair applications in healthcare.
Related Concept Videos
Causality in Epidemiology
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
Observational Studies
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...