Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Integrated Compensatory Responses in a Human Model of Hemorrhage
Published on: November 20, 2016
Relative Superiority: A framework for military and civilian trauma care based on special operations warfare
Kanwal Singh1, Pierre-Marc Dion, Verity Tulloch
1Defence Research and Development Canada (K.S.), Toronto Research Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (K.S., V.T., A.B.), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Royal Canadian Medical Service (K.S., P.-M.D., A.B.), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family Medicine (P.-M.D.), Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Surgery (A.B.), Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Member of the Trauma Association of Canada (TAC), Caledon, Ontario, Canada (A.B.).
Abstract:
The foundational principles in trauma care align with the operational strategies of Special Forces. Here we present a novel perspective on trauma care drawn from the book "Spec Ops-Case Studies in Special Operations Warfare: Theory and Practice" (1995) by Admiral (Ret'd) William H. McRaven. The book introduces the concept of Relative Superiority (RS), defined as a point in time when a smaller, well-trained, and well-prepared force gains a decisive advantage over a larger adversary. Achieving and maintaining RS requires precise timing and coordinated action. As time progresses, the opportunity to gain or retain this advantage diminishes. In trauma care, RS can be compared with the critical window for achieving hemorrhage control, timely resuscitation, and rapid transition to damage control surgery. Delays in these interventions decrease survival probability. If hemorrhage control is achieved but not sustained, re-establishing it becomes increasingly difficult and often fatal. This framework is illustrated through two trauma case studies. In Case Study I, timely interventions result in sustained control and survival. In Case Study II, delays led to only temporary control, which was subsequently lost, contributing to patient death. Within the RS framework, rapid surgical access can shift the advantage by attenuating hemorrhage and mitigating shock; however, speed alone does not guarantee survival. Achieving and maintaining RS requires sustained hemostasis, access to resources, and delivery of high-quality care. Applying the RS framework to trauma care offers a structured approach to evaluating the timing and effectiveness of interventions during critical phases of care. Its integration into Morbidity and Mortality discussions may help identify missed opportunities, guide performance improvement, and inform system-level changes. This conceptual model may support trauma teams in understanding how small gains at key moments influence overall outcomes in high-acuity clinical scenarios. ( J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2026;101: S146-S151. Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.).
Related Concept Videos
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Symptoms and Behavioral Manifestations
A spectrum of distressing symptoms characterizes PTSD. Recurrent flashbacks, where individuals involuntarily relive traumatic events, are a...
Traumatic Brain Injury l: Introduction
Traumatic Memory
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Secondary Healthcare System

