Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Outer-Boundary Assisted Segmentation and Quantification of Trabecular Bones by an Imagej Plugin
Published on: March 14, 2018
Sivan Unit (SU) for standardization of voxel intensity in CBCT: A multi-vendor, multi-centric validation study
1Professor and HOD, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad Uttar Pradesh, 244001, India.
Objective:
To develop and validate the Sivan Unit (SU), a biologically referenced voxel intensity harmonization framework for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) designed to improve cross-vendor grayscale consistency in quantitative maxillofacial imaging.
Methods:
This retrospective multi-vendor, multi-centric study analyzed 160 CBCT datasets from ten commercial scanner systems. Raw voxel intensities (VIraw) from seven maxillofacial tissues were first processed using global Z-score transformation to reduce gross scaling differences. These were subsequently mapped using two internal biological anchors: dental pulp (0 SU) and cortical bone (1000 SU). Inter-scanner consistency was evaluated using one-way ANOVA, coefficient of variation (CV), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis.
Results:
Pre-harmonization intensities demonstrated significant inter-scanner variability across all tissues (p < 0.001), with a mean CV of 14.7%. Following SU transformation, voxel intensity distributions showed no significant inter-vendor differences (all p > 0.05), with the mean CV reduced to 2.1%. Reliability was excellent across all categories (ICC: 0.89-0.97). Bland-Altman analysis confirmed a marked reduction in inter-scanner bias and a narrowing of 95% limits of agreement. The intrinsic biological hierarchy (enamel > cortical bone > dentin > trabecular bone > pulp > soft tissue > air) was preserved post harmonization (r = 0.992, p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
The Sivan Unit (SU) provides a biologically anchored harmonization framework that effectively eliminates vendor-dependent variability without external phantoms or absolute physical calibration. By ensuring cross-platform reproducibility, the SU framework provides a standardized quantitative foundation that may support future radiomics and AI-based applications in maxillofacial radiology.
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

