Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Carcinogen-induced Murine Bladder Tumors
Published on: March 29, 2019
Reprogramming-driven Proteomic Shifts Mirror Bladder Cancer Progression and Reveal Biomarker Candidates Across
Banu Iskender1, Mehmet Sarihan2, Bengi Su Rumeysa Barlak2
1Protein Research and Proteomics Laboratory, Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Izmit, Türkiye banu.iskender@kocaeli.edu.tr banu.iskender@yahoo.com.
Background/Aim:
The acquisition of stem-like properties and increased cellular plasticity is thought to drive tumor progression and therapeutic resistance, but grade-specific molecular trajectories across the epigenetic landscape in bladder cancer remain poorly defined. This study examined the dynamic rewiring of signaling networks and proteomic landscapes during reprogramming of low-grade (HTB-2) and high-grade (HTB-5) bladder cancer cells, and during their subsequent differentiation into embryoid bodies.
Materials And Methods:
Six experimental models were analyzed, including the parental HTB-2 and HTB-5 cells, their Sendai virus-reprogrammed counterparts (rep HTB-2 and rep HTB-5) and embryoid bodies generated from reprogrammed derivatives (rep HTB-2 EB and rep HTB-5 EB), with SV-HUC-1 uroepithelial cells used as a control. Phosphoproteomic and integrated proteomic analyses were performed to define grade-specific signaling architectures and shared plasticity-associated signatures, followed by clinical validation using pan-cancer datasets.
Results:
Phosphoproteomic reconstruction revealed grade-dependent kinase network architectures associated with stem-like induction. These findings indicate that reprogramming induced cell-line-specific signaling rewiring, with HTB-2 cells showing enhanced MAPK/Src-family-associated phosphorylation and HTB-5 cells showing increased AKT/PRAS40 and STAT1/STAT3 phosphorylation together with reduced ERK1/2-MSK1/2 signaling. During differentiation, low-grade cells underwent metabolic reprogramming, while high-grade cells favored cytoskeletal remodeling and extracellular matrix organization. Integrated proteomics defined a shared plasticity signature, with reprogrammed models recapitulated key bladder cancer features and clinically relevant outcomes.
Conclusion:
These findings support a hierarchical model of bladder cancer progression where reprogramming induces a transient intermediate state that enables invasive features upon re-differentiation. The study reveals grade-specific signaling and proteomic adaptations, identifying differentiation as a critical window for uncovering prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Together, these results suggest that reprogrammed bladder cancer models provide a biologically relevant platform to study tumor plasticity, progression and therapeutic vulnerability.
