Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026
Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Measurement properties of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx): a systematic review and
Sabrina Eggmann1, Camilo Caceres-Parra2, Ashlea Hills3
1Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Intensive Care and Neonatology and Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Physiotherapy, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Question:
What are the measurement properties of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx) for evaluating physical function and activity for rehabilitation of patients who are critically ill?
Methods:
A systematic search was conducted in five databases to 12 January 2026. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed quality for each measurement property (COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist); quality of each available measurement property was independently evaluated by any two reviewers who judged the quality as very good, adequate, doubtful or inadequate. Data were synthesised according to COSMIN guidelines, with random-effects meta-analyses for intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Pooled results were rated and the evidence graded as very low, low, moderate or high quality.
Results:
27 studies investigated 71 measurement properties (inadequate to very good). The CPAx was feasible, with small floor and ceiling effects across the trajectory of recovery. Content validity was high (pooled index 0.94; high-quality evidence). The CPAx demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability (pooled ICC 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.00, six studies, high-quality evidence), intra-rater reliability (ICC 0.95, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.97, one study, low-quality evidence) and acceptable standard error of measurement (pooled SEM 1.36, five studies) corresponding to a smallest detectable change of 3.76 (sufficient rating, high-quality evidence). Construct validity was supported with 26 out of 34 predefined hypotheses accepted (76%, sufficient, 10 studies, moderate-quality evidence) and responsiveness with five out of six predefined hypotheses accepted (83%, sufficient, five studies, very low-quality evidence).
Conclusion:
Moderate- to high-quality evidence indicates that the CPAx is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating physical function and activity of critically ill patients. Further research is needed to evaluate responsiveness.
Registration:
PROSPERO CRD420250655518.
Related Concept Videos
01:05Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the patient.
01:27Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
01:24Chest Physiotherapy
Purpose
CPT is primarily used for patients with excessive bronchial secretions who have difficulty clearing...
01:30Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
01:23Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...
01:23Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...