Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
Published on: December 5, 2014
Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering
Haden Dewis1, Michael C Hout2,3, Joseph W Houpt4
1School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Shackleton Building, Highfield Campus, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. hsdd1g18@soton.ac.uk.
None:
The impact of target prevalence (the proportion of trials in which a target appears) has been widely studied within visual search. The low prevalence effect is the finding that rare targets are often missed. Mind wandering, where one's attention drifts away from a primary goal, impairs performance across various tasks, but its influence in low-prevalence search remains unclear. We recruited 60 participants from the general population and examined their mind-wandering rates as they searched for either low- (10%) or high- (50%) prevalence targets. When participants were engaged in mind wandering, response accuracy was reduced and target-absent response times increased. Low-prevalence targets were missed more than high-prevalence targets, but to our surprise, we discovered that most of the low-prevalence effect could be attributed to mind wandering in the majority our analyses. This marks a substantial shift in our understanding of the prevalence effect.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
The Availability Heuristic
Subliminal Perception
Subconsciousness and No Awareness
An illustrative example of subconscious processing is its role in problem-solving. Often, individuals...

