Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Clinical subphenotypes in septic patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation: validation and parsimonious classifier
Lin Zhang1,2, Jiangjing Li3, Xiaolin Shang4
1Department of Cardiology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Background:
The substantial heterogeneity among septic patients with new‑onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) complicates intensive care unit (ICU) management, and the absence of a parsimonious subphenotype classifier has impeded the implementation of personalized therapeutic strategies. In this study, we aim to identify the subphenotype of septic patients with NOAF, develop a concise classifier model, and reveal the differential efficacy of heart-rate control therapies across these subphenotypes.
Methods:
This retrospective study utilized data from the Medical Information Mart in Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV and MIMIC-III database. Consensus clustering based on hierarchical clustering was employed for subphenotype derivation. Nine supervised classifiers were employed to construct the subphenotype classifier, including random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector machine (SVM), partial least squares (PLS), neural network (NN), naïve Bayes (NB), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost.M1). Subphenotype-specific propensity score-derived stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights was used to weight comparisons of intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay and discharge dispositions across subphenotypes.
Results:
Among 1535 septic patients with NOAF, three distinct subphenotypes emerged: Phenotype A was the mildest subgroup; Phenotype B exhibited pronounced metabolic acidosis, highest anion gap, severe renal impairment, and elevated severity scores; Phenotype C showed intermediate laboratory values and score profiles with notable hyperchloremia and inflammatory markers. A parsimonious model established by SVM showed the best effectiveness. HR-control therapy was associated with subphenotype-specific reductions in hospital and ICU lengths of stay and more favorable discharge dispositions in Phenotype A, while more favorable survival outcomes were observed across all three subphenotypes in IPTW-weighted analyses.
Conclusion:
Cluster analysis revealed three clinically relevant subphenotypes among septic patients with NOAF, each demonstrating distinct clinical outcomes and heterogeneous responses to heart rate control therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe and...
Dysrhythmias II: Classification of Tachyarrhythmias