Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026

12:45
Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Extrapedicular approach for basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation: a conceptual review
Jimmy Wen1,2,3, Megan Kou1, Nathaniel Duong1
1California Northstate University College of Medicine, 9700 W Taron Dr, Elk Grove, CA, 95757, USA.
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
|June 29, 2026
Summary
Basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation (BVN RFA) for chronic low back pain offers two approaches: transpedicular and extrapedicular. Current evidence does not favor one over the other, necessitating further research into their comparative efficacy and safety.
Area of Science:
- Pain Management
- Minimally Invasive Spine Procedures
- Interventional Radiology
Background:
- Chronic axial low back pain (LBP) of vertebrogenic origin is a recognized clinical entity.
- Basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation (BVN RFA) is an effective treatment for this condition.
- Understanding different access routes for BVN RFA is crucial for patient selection and procedural success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To synthesize anatomical, biomechanical, and safety considerations of transpedicular and extrapedicular access routes for BVN RFA.
- To evaluate the clinical implications of these distinct approaches.
- To compare the emerging extrapedicular approach with the standard transpedicular technique.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a literature review of PubMed articles on BVN RFA anatomy, techniques, and access routes.
- Included studies on vertebral augmentation for access route considerations due to limited extrapedicular BVN RFA literature.
- Focused on publications up to December 1, 2025.
Main Results:
- The standard transpedicular approach offers a consistent trajectory but involves proximity to sensitive structures.
- The extrapedicular approach provides a lateral pathway, potentially beneficial for patients with anatomical challenges like narrow pedicles or instrumentation.
- Emerging evidence describes the extrapedicular technique for specific patient populations.
Conclusions:
- No current clinical evidence demonstrates the superiority of the extrapedicular approach over the transpedicular approach for BVN RFA.
- Both approaches have unique anatomical considerations, technical challenges, and risks requiring imaging guidance and precise landmark adherence.
- Further biomechanical, cadaveric, animal, and clinical studies are needed to compare the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of each approach.