Related Experiment Videos
Abstract:
The law's allocation of responsibility for disputed bank payments is important not only for banks and customers, but also, given the volume and value of payments, for the economy more broadly. This article examines loss allocation under common law, EU-UK regulation and the UK's 'world-first' scheme for 'authorised push payment' frauds, showing that the gross negligence standard of customer conduct is a common feature. Indeed, this 'slippery concept' sits at critical junctures, providing, in practice, the most relevant limitation to a bank's liability to refund payments. The article analyses what this standard means in English common law and in its regulatory contexts, and highlights the important connection between the two. It then draws upon decisions by the UK's Financial Ombudsman Service, amongst other sources, to explore how evaluating bank customer conduct works in practice, concluding that it is time for regulators to rethink the status quo.
Related Concept Videos
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts I
Intentional...
Torts II
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Real Number Operations
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security: