Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer: An Office Procedure
Published on: March 30, 2021
18F-Fluciclovine or 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-guided Salvage Radiotherapy Changes in Postprostatectomy Biochemical
Olayinka A Abiodun-Ojo1, Ashesh B Jani2, Subir Goyal3
1Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30322.
Abstract:
Background PET with gallium 68 (68Ga) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 and fluorine 18 (18F) fluciclovine has influenced salvage radiation therapy (sRT) planning in postprostatectomy biochemical recurrence. Purpose To assess the comparative impact of 18F-fluciclovine and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on sRT changes in postprostatectomy biochemical recurrence. Materials and Methods In this secondary analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial, men with detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after prostatectomy were randomly assigned to undergo 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT (arm A) or 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (arm B) between May 2019 and May 2023. The Clopper-Pearson binomial method was used to evaluate decision changes on whether to offer radiation therapy (RT) and to which field (with or without boost) between the pre- and post-PET time points in each arm, and to compare decision changes between the arms. Results A total of 140 eligible participants (age range, 47-83 years) were randomly assigned 1:1 to arm A (mean age, 63 years ± 8 [SD]; median pre-RT PSA level, 0.27 ng/mL) or to arm B (mean age, 65 years ± 8; median pre-RT PSA, 0.35 ng/mL). Six participants (five in the 18F-fluciclovine group and one in the 68Ga-PSMA-11 group) withdrew from the trial before undergoing PET/CT. Overall sRT decision changes occurred in 19 of 65 participants (29%) in arm A (P < .001) and 29 of 69 participants (42%) in arm B (P < .001), but there was no evidence of a difference between arms (P = .12). Among participants for whom the final decision was to offer them sRT, treatment field (and/or boost) changes occurred in 43 of 60 participants (72%) in arm A (P < .001) and 33 of 61 participants (54%) in arm B (P < .001) and were more likely with 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT than with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (P = .046). Conclusion In postprostatectomy biochemical recurrence, the use of 18F-fluciclovine and 68Ga-PSMA-11 for PET/CT-guided sRT planning resulted in substantial treatment decision changes, but there was no difference in the likelihood of a decision change between the two radiotracers. Treatment field (and/or boost) changes were more likely with 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT than with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Clinical trial registration no. NCT03762759 © RSNA, 2026 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Iravani in this issue.

