Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Establishment and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Pathological Escalation of Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Published on: February 16, 2024
Pilot study of EsoCheck/EsoGuard for detecting Barrett's esophagus in high-risk patients undergoing hiatal hernia
Wai Lone Jonathan Ho1, Yifan Liang1, Parker Penny1
1University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.
Background:
Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has poor survival outcomes, yet population-level screening remains limited. EsoCheck, a swallowable balloon device paired with the EsoGuard DNA methylation assay, is a minimally invasive screening tool for Barrett's esophagus (BE), a precursor to EAC. Hiatal hernia is a strong risk factor for BE. This pilot study provides preliminary insight into the diagnostic performance of intraoperative EsoCheck/EsoGuard compared with upper endoscopic biopsies for screening patients undergoing hiatal hernia repair.
Methods:
This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a single institution. Eligible participants were aged ≥ 18, had a diagnosis of GERD, and were undergoing BE screening or surveillance followed by planned hiatal hernia repair. Exclusion criteria included a history of esophageal malignancy or surgery. Patients were placed under general anesthesia for sample collection, followed by hiatal hernia repair. Distal esophageal samples collected via EsoCheck and upper endoscopy were analyzed by the EsoGuard assay and histopathology, respectively.
Results:
28 patients underwent successful sample collection and hernia repair. Mean BMI was 28.6 ± 6.2 and mean age was 56.9 ± 14.9 years. Patients were 71% women, 79% White, 36% obese, and 39% had a history of smoking. Mean number of risk factors per patient based on ACG guidelines was 3.5 ± 1.1. BE was detected in 6 (21%) patients, with 3 being short-segment BE (< 3 cm). EsoGuard showed sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI 35.9-99.6) and specificity of 63.6% (95% CI 40.7-82.8). Positive predictive value was 38.5% (95% CI 24.4-54.7) and negative predictive value was 93.3% (95% CI 69.5-98.9). Of the 8 patients with false-positive EsoGuard results, 5 had chronic inflammatory mucosal changes on pathology. No complications were associated with EsoCheck sampling.
Conclusions:
EsoCheck/EsoGuard demonstrates high sensitivity and meets the criteria for a screening tool for BE. Given its low specificity, positive results mandate a confirmatory test, such as upper endoscopy with biopsies.
Related Concept Videos
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more similar...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Upper GI Series: Barium Swallow
Purpose and Procedure
Patients undergoing this procedure ingest a liquid containing barium sulfate with a chalky...

