Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

07:07
Biomechanical Characterization of Human Soft Tissues Using Indentation and Tensile Testing
Published on: December 13, 2016
Wearable-device geometry and tissue mechanical variability determine sacral soft-tissue loading and pressure injury
Anastasiia Simonova1, Aleksei Orlov1, Daphne Weihs2
1Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Journal of Tissue Viability
|June 30, 2026
Summary
Wearable device shape significantly impacts tissue damage risk. Circular sensors cause superficial stress, while cable designs create deeper tissue strain, crucial for assessing pressure-induced injuries.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Biomedical Engineering
- Tissue Mechanics
Background:
- Wearable sensors are common in healthcare, often placed on bony areas like the sacrum.
- Sustained pressure from devices can cause tissue damage, with mechanical deformation being a key factor.
- The impact of device geometry on stress and strain in underlying tissues is not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how different wearable device geometries influence stress and strain distribution in sacral tissues.
- To quantify the mechanical risk associated with various device shapes and pressure levels.
- To understand the role of tissue stiffness variability in pressure-induced tissue damage.
Main Methods:
- Developed a 3D finite element model of the sacral region including skin, fat, muscle, and bone.
- Simulated two device geometries: a circular sensor and an elongated cable segment.
- Applied static pressures (2-10 kPa) and varied tissue stiffness (±10%, ±20%) to assess mechanical exposure.
Main Results:
- Circular sensors concentrated stress superficially in the skin.
- Cable geometries redistributed mechanical load to deeper tissues (adipose and muscle).
- At high pressure, cable loading led to maximal strain-based risk in deeper tissues, while stress remained highest superficially.
Conclusions:
- Device geometry is a critical determinant of tissue-level mechanical exposure and potential damage.
- Circular devices pose a superficial stress risk, whereas cable designs create deeper tissue strain risk.
- Geometry-aware, deformation-based risk assessment is essential for wearable devices in pressure-vulnerable areas.
