Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Hepatic Glucose Production, Ureagenesis, and Lipolysis Quantified using the Perfused Mouse Liver Model
Published on: October 6, 2023
Finding the dispersion number (DN) of the dispersion model from perfused rat and human liver studies
K Sandy Pang1, Rommel G Tirona2, Betty P Li1
1Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract:
The dispersion number (DN), which relates to intrahepatic mixing and impacts hepatic clearance (CLH), is assessed routinely in liver perfusion studies. However, the estimation methods are nonuniform, and estimates for human livers are unknown. Schwab et al (1998) identified DN estimates for red cells, albumin, sucrose, and water for closed (CBC) (0.31 ± 0.13) and mixed (MBC) boundary conditions (0.22 ± 0.07) (P < .05) from perfused rat livers with inclusion of t0, transit time of large vessels (4.1 ± 0.7 seconds) and MTTcath (mean transit time for catheters/injection devices), which defined the nonhepatic transfer function (TFNH). To address the importance of t0 and TFNH, we refitted the digitized data of Schwab by omitting TFNH, which yielded similar DN estimates (0.28 ± 0.11 for CBC and 0.21 ± 0.11 for MBC) but a longer time lag (tlag) (9-10 seconds) that equaled (t0 + MTTcath). Fitting without t0 or tlag provided much lower DN estimates (0.020-0.078) for red cells, albumin, and sucrose though less for water (0.263 ± 0.006 for CBC and 0.223 ± 0.006 MBC) due to improper correction of the mean transit time (MTTcorr), rendering a lower CV2 (variance/MTTcorr2) and therefore DN. Notably, fitting of digitized human liver perfusion data without TFNH (=0) but tlag (>0) yielded sound DNs of 0.31 ± 0.12 for CBC and 0.24 ± 0.12 for MBC and tlags of 8.3-10.5 seconds, values reminiscent of rat livers. These results suggest that human livers display closely similar DN values (0.2-0.3) as those of rat livers, with predicted intrinsic clearance values that differ only by 10%-13% between the CBC and MBC to yield the same CLH. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Dispersion numbers (DN) based on fitting liver perfusion data to the dispersion model (DM) requires a time lag (tlag) or large vessel transit time (t0), but the nonhepatic transfer function (TFNH) is not strictly required. Fitting of rat and human liver perfusion data with tlag provides sound DNestimates: 0.26-0.31 and 0.22-0.24, respectively, for closed and mixed boundary conditions (P>.05). These DN values suggest that the intrinsic clearance (CLint,DM) values for MBC/CBC differ only by 13% in their prediction of hepatic clearance.

