Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Forced Flowering in Mandarin Trees under Phytotron Conditions
Published on: March 6, 2019
Interactive canopy nitrogen and water additions delay phenology in a warm-temperate forest
1College of Geographic Sciences, Faculty of Geographical Science and Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China; Henan Dabieshan National Field Observation and Research Station of Forest Ecosystem, Xinyang 464000, China; Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for the Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions (Henan University), Ministry of Education, Kaifeng 475004, China; Xinyang Academy of Ecological Research, Xinyang 464000, China.
Introduction:
Plant phenology is a critical link between environmental change and ecosystem processes, representing a key indicator for evaluating plant growth and carbon sink dynamics under global change. However, the interactive effects of canopy-level nitrogen and water additions on temperate forest phenology remain poorly characterized.
Objectives:
This study aimed to elucidate the interactive effects of N and water addition on the phenology of dominant temperate forest species.
Methods:
We investigated the effects of canopy N addition (CN), water addition (CW), and their combination (CNW) on the spring and autumn phenology of three functional groups (large trees, small trees, and shrubs) in a warm-temperate forest.
Results:
The plant responses were highly dependent on both functional group and species. CN significantly delayed bud swelling stage in large trees (0.83 ± 1.04 days) and budburst stage in shrubs (1.50 ± 0.38 days). In small trees, CW alone advanced bud swelling (12.50 ± 1.90 days), whereas CNW produced a more complex, antagonistic effect (N-water interaction p < 0.05). For large trees, N-water interaction synergistically delayed autumn coloration and leaf fall (p < 0.05). In contrast, CNW alone delayed most autumn phenophases in small trees, while advancing the peak and end of leaf coloration in shrubs (9.38 ± 3.48 and 10.88 ± 2.99 days), without a significant N-water interaction.
Conclusion:
CN and CW did not directly regulate plant phenology in a simple manner. Instead, they altered habitat conditions and plant physiological status, leading to heterogeneous phenological shifts among functional groups, including inhibitory effects as well as phenological delays and advancements. These findings offer critical insights for predicting forest phenology and carbon cycling dynamics under global change.
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Responses to Heat and Cold Stress
Regulation of Transpiration by Stomata
Biological Clocks and Seasonal Responses
Inorganic Nitrogen Assimilation
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss

