Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Dynamic coronary roadmap-guided versus traditional percutaneous coronary intervention techniques in contrast medium
Amjad Almansi1, Shahd Alqato2, Lama Hossam Taher3
1Prince Hamza Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
Background:
Dynamic Coronary Roadmap (DCR) is a novel software providing a motion-compensated, real-time overlay of coronary arteries to assist PCI device navigation with a single contrast injection. This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness and safety of DCR.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception to May 5, 2024. Outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects models. PROSPERO registration: CRD42024553689.
Results:
Eight studies (two RCTs, six observational; 1,512 patients) were included. DCR-guided PCI significantly reduced contrast media volume (MD = - 45.82 mL, 95% CI - 68.33 to - 23.30; P < 0.001; I2 = 97%), air kerma (MD = - 283.09 mGy, 95% CI - 474.47 to - 91.70; P = 0.004; I2 = 99%), dose area product (MD = - 6.85 Gy/cm2, 95% CI - 10.48 to - 3.22; P = 0.0002; I2 = 82%), radiation duration (MD = - 2.79 min, 95% CI - 4.59 to - 0.98; P = 0.002; I2 = 94%), and procedural duration (MD = - 3.51 min, 95% CI - 6.69 to - 0.32; P = 0.03; I2 = 0%). No significant differences were found in procedural success (RR = 1.00; 95% CI 0.99-1.01; I2 = 0%) or acute kidney injury incidence (RR = 0.40; 95% CI 0.15-1.08; I2 = 0%). Risk of bias was mixed for RCTs (low to high risk across domains) and moderate to high for observational studies, with most scoring ≥ 7 on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Conclusion:
DCR-guided PCI was associated with reductions in contrast use and radiation metrics without compromising procedural success; however, the overall certainty of evidence is low due to study design limitations, risk of bias, and substantial heterogeneity, warranting cautious interpretation.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina IV: Management
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
