Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Inter-institutional heterogeneity in high-volume esophageal cancer centers: an ancillary study of JCOG1109
Ryosuke Kita1,2, Ryunosuke Machida2, Haruhiko Fukuda2
1Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Background:
Multimodal esophageal cancer treatment carries substantial perioperative risks. Although centralization has improved outcomes, variability may persist even among high-volume centers. This study aimed to evaluate inter-institutional heterogeneity in perioperative and survival outcomes using data from JCOG1109.
Methods:
JCOG1109, a phase III multicenter trial, compared neoadjuvant cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (CF); docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF); and cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil combined with radiotherapy (CF-RT) for stage IB-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Individual patient data and institutional survey results were analyzed. Mixed-effects models with random intercepts and slopes, incorporating institutions as random effects, were applied to quantify heterogeneity in DCF and CF-RT's treatment effects on postoperative complications, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), separated from baseline institutional risks in the CF arm.
Results:
From 44 institutions, 580 patients were eligible and 546 underwent surgery. PFS treatment effect variance was smaller than baseline risk variability (CF: 0.062, standard deviation [SD]: 0.069; DCF: 0.044, SD: 0.053; CF-RT: 0.051, SD: 0.057), whereas OS variance exceeded baseline risk (CF: 0.058, SD: 0.068; DCF: 0.080, SD: 0.094; CF-RT: 0.072, SD: 0.079). Complication variance was lower in both experimental arms (CF: 0.342, SD: 0.432; DCF: 0.111, SD: 0.168; CF-RT: 0.190, SD: 0.326), although it was greater in the CF-RT arm than in the DCF arm.
Conclusions:
Multimodal treatment was delivered with high consistency across specialized centers, as reflected by minimal heterogeneity in PFS. In contrast, moderate heterogeneity in OS indicated institutional influences, particularly post-recurrence management, which should be considered in trial designs and clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Studies I: Bronchoscopy and Thoracoscopy
Bronchoscopy
Description
Bronchoscopy is a procedure that involves direct visualization of the larynx, trachea, and bronchi for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. A flexible fiber optic or rigid bronchoscope is used to carry out the procedure. The fiber-optic bronchoscope is more frequently used due to...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Esophageal Achalasia